Sleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance

Faber, Nadira S.; Häusser, Jan A.; Kerr, Norbert L.

doi:10.1177/1088868315609487

Cited by 50 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 215 publications

(282 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A series of longitudinal and cross‐sectional studies by Christ et al (2014) showed that group‐level effects, in particular more tolerant norms, acted above and beyond individual‐level processes that reduce prejudice as a result of intergroup contact (e.g., access to prejudice inconsistent information or reappraisal of the ingroup, see Pettigrew, 1998). Another example is group performance that critically depends on the individual‐level (such as learning) and group‐level processes (such as coordination; Faber, Häusser, & Kerr, 2017; Hackman & Morris, 1975). We argue that in virtually all group phenomena individual‐level processes and group‐level processes can be identified and distinguished.…”

Section: Expanding Scope and Broader Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The how and the when of the social cure: A conceptual model of group‐ and individual‐level mechanisms linking social identity to health and well‐being

Häusser

Junker

Dick

2020

Euro J Social Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we aim at theoretical specification and integration of mechanisms proposed within the Social Identity Approach to Health and Well‐being. We differentiate group‐level and individual‐level effects of shared social identity by distinguishing three different aspects: individual identification, group identification, and individually perceived group identification. We discuss specific group‐level mechanisms (i.e., mutual social support and collective self‐efficacy) and individual level‐mechanisms (i.e., attribution and appraisal processes regarding stressors and resources) for each of the three aspects. A core conclusion is that the positive effects of shared social identity on health and well‐being crucially depend on its close relationship with social support, and that although social support is an interindividual phenomenon, it is intraindividual mechanisms—attribution and appraisal—that shape the psychological partnership between social identity and social support. Therefore, we put special emphasis on cross‐level interactions between group‐ and individual‐level mechanisms, which have been widely neglected in earlier research.

show abstract

Section: Expanding Scope and Broader Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The how and the when of the social cure: A conceptual model of group‐ and individual‐level mechanisms linking social identity to health and well‐being

Häusser

Junker

Dick

2020

Euro J Social Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has nutraceutical approach that can able to reduce colorectal cancer [11,20,43,45,68,102] The caffeine can significantly improve our physical performance Through reducing rating of perceived exertion during and after exercise [103][104][105][106] Coffee consumption can fight stress and make active our brain and it has beneficial influence on mood, cognitive function, performance and hydration Through improvements in physical endurance, cognitive function, particularly alertness and vigilance, mood and perception of fatigue.…”

Section: Health Benefit Of Coffee Consumption Description Of Action Smentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Health Benefit and Risk of Coffee Consumption

Wachamo¹

2017

Med Aromat Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coffee is the world's beloved drink that is the most regularly consumed caffeine-containing beverage next to water and tea. It contains a multipart combination of chemicals constituents, which associated with health benefits, most consumers, begin their day with a minimum a cup of coffee after eating food, and end their workday with coffee. It is considered as a significant part of modern daily life because it has an alerting outcome on the human brain. Opposing this, various groups report experiencing uneven health risks thus hesitant to drink coffee, this suggests individual disparity to coffee intolerance. The aim of this review was to in brief summarize health benefits and risks coffee consumption. Most of the informative reports suggested that long-term consumption of coffee and decaffeinated coffee can reduce the risk of many diseases. Among these it is used to boosts our physical performance, burn fat, reduces risk of stroke, liver, prostate and colorectal cancer by 20%, risk of Parkinson's disease by 25%, lower risk of Type II diabetes, reduces risk of dementia and protects our mind, brightens our mood, helps us to fight depression and minimize risk of suicide by 50%. In addition, coffee consumers have less risk of heart disease, with strongly integrated DNA. Also reports that coffee drinking has also naturally extended sleep latency, minimizes total sleep time and its effectiveness, and worsened supposed sleep feature.However, from positive health prospect of coffee consumption, a recent study finds coffee consumption does not always provide protective benefits because overdrinking is associated with negative impact or risk on our health. Some negative impact of coffee consumption on our health; it reduces appetite levels for food, impact on pregnant women, on people with cholesterol, cause insomnia and restlessness, breast tissue cysts in women, incontinence digestive disorders, and risk of headaches. In addition, decrease fertility probability in female and male, cause allergies and miscarriage, forceful heart contractions, anxiety, depression and the need for anxiety medication, inhibits collagen production in the skin of human being, less hearing loss improvement, does not help with extended sleep deprivation interferes with ossification and could also lead to greater risk of bone fracture. Finally, the most recent studies reported that coffee consumption is beneficial for our health when it is optimum range approximately four cups on average. The supplementary research will be crucial to make clear that both the health benefits and risk of coffee consumption.

show abstract

“…Studies testing alcohol and caffeine demonstrate that being in a group can alter the emotional effects of consuming these substances. With respect to nicotine, animal researchers report a synergistic interaction between the rewarding effects of nicotine and social interaction .…”

Section: Acute Effects Of Smokingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The case for investigating social context in laboratory studies of smoking

Dimoff

Sayette

2016

Addiction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background With increasing frequency, addiction is conceived of as a brain disease, and such accounts seem especially pertinent with regard to the rapid delivery of nicotine to the brain via cigarette smoke. Moreover, drug administration trials (cigarette puffs) suggest that the behavior of smoking becomes automatized, with individuals developing prototypic approaches to smoking a cigarette. Compared with presumably more social activities such as drinking alcohol, there may be little opportunity for social processes to influence smoking behavior. Yet survey research examining smoking motivation often reveals a broadly defined “social” factor and field research suggests that social context does influence smoking. Argument We posit that laboratory smoking research has largely ignored social contextual factors that may help to understand better the precise mechanisms underlying smoking behavior and smoking motivation. Method We reviewed laboratory studies examining the effect of social context (operationalized as modeling) on smoking behavior. Studies were identified by searching PsychInfo and Medline using the following keywords: smoking, nicotine, tobacco, cigarette, consumption, topography, puff, smoking behavior, cigarettes smoked, modeling, imitation, social context, social influence, peer pressure. The reference and citation lists of these studies were then searched to identify additional studies. Conclusions Few laboratory smoking studies target social context. Those few studies indicate that smoking behavior can be influenced by the presence of others. There is also some evidence that social context influences the effects of smoking as well as processes related to self-perception and self-regulation that reinforce smoking and hamper smoking cessation efforts.

show abstract

Sleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance

Cited by 50 publications

References 215 publications

The how and the when of the social cure: A conceptual model of group‐ and individual‐level mechanisms linking social identity to health and well‐being

The how and the when of the social cure: A conceptual model of group‐ and individual‐level mechanisms linking social identity to health and well‐being

Review on Health Benefit and Risk of Coffee Consumption

The case for investigating social context in laboratory studies of smoking

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About