2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00154-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep deprivation as a predictor of response to light therapy in major depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 35% improvement in depression as compared to dim light control treatment was observed at the end of a week. This benefit has recently been replicated by Bloching et al [2000] and Fritzsche et al [2001]. We examined whether this antidepressant benefit could be obtained in an outpatient setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A 35% improvement in depression as compared to dim light control treatment was observed at the end of a week. This benefit has recently been replicated by Bloching et al [2000] and Fritzsche et al [2001]. We examined whether this antidepressant benefit could be obtained in an outpatient setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -III Revision and -IV (DSM-III-R and -IV) were prevalent diagnostic questionnaires in selected articles. Twenty-one studies used Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) for scoring mood states [9], [11], [15], [16], [20][21][22][23], [30], [32], [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. The other studies used scales such Geriatric Depression Scale, Major Depression Inventory and The International Classification of Diseases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the PEDro scale, the qualities of selected studies were generally high ranging from 7/11 to 11/11. Deltito et al, [16] 1M/16F 36 ± NR MDD, BD, UBD DSM-III-R 10 Fritzsche et al, [37] 14M/26F 47.0 ± 11.0 MDD, SAD DSM-IV 10 Goel et al, [40] 8M/24F 43.1 ± 12.0 MDD DSM-IV 9 Holsboer-Trachsler et al, [42] 22M/22F 52.0 ± 9.0 MDD, BD, UBD, DD DSM-III-R 10 Kripke et al, [9] 11M/1F Mean age not reported MDD, BD RDC 9 Kripke et al, [22] 50M/1F 48.0 ± NR MDD, BD DSM-III 9…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations