The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.06.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SKR-QA: Semantic ranking and knowledge revise for multi-choice question answering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fernández-Álvarez et al (2021) designed an importance ranking method on a complex knowledge graph to rank the class importance. In natural language, Ren et al (2021) evaluated the importance of knowledge from a semantic perspective. Zhong et al (2021) analyzed the correlation between candidate concepts through semantic similarity to calculate the semantic weight of concepts and extract important concepts.…”
Section: Knowledge-point Importance Discovery Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernández-Álvarez et al (2021) designed an importance ranking method on a complex knowledge graph to rank the class importance. In natural language, Ren et al (2021) evaluated the importance of knowledge from a semantic perspective. Zhong et al (2021) analyzed the correlation between candidate concepts through semantic similarity to calculate the semantic weight of concepts and extract important concepts.…”
Section: Knowledge-point Importance Discovery Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a similar idea, with post-hoc interpretation of intermediate results, the system by Ju et al [78] penalizes the attributions between the wrong answers and their supporting text snippets. Instead of only relying on the given context, Ren et al [79] tried to retrieve additional knowledge from an external corpus for context augmentation. Prioritizing speed, DeFormer [80] processes the context and the question independently in the lower layers of PLMs based on the observation that there is less variance in the lower layer representations of the text when jointly modeled with different questions.…”
Section: A An Overview Of Major Legal Nlp Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As deep learning and natural language processing technology rapidly advances, the question-answering system gradually transitions from early rule matching to retrieval matching [15]. The core idea is to extract the core words in natural language questions, search for the relevant answers in documents or web pages according to the core words and return the corresponding answers using the correlation sorting algorithm.…”
Section: Question Answering Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%