1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skinfold thickness measurements are better predictors of body fat percentage than body mass index in male Spanish children and adolescents

Abstract: Objective: To develop equations, from some simple anthropometric measurements, for the prediction of body density from underwater weighing in male spanish children and adolescents. Subjects: One hundred and seventy-®ve males, aged 7.0±16.9 y, participated in this study, they were recruited from primary and secondary schools. Measurements: Body weight and height and skinfold thicknesses by anthropometry, body density by underwater weighing. Results: Correlations between body density and body mass index (BMI) we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
84
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For groups, as other authors have recommended (Reilly et al, 1995;Wong et al, 2000;Moreno et al, 2003), skinfold thickness equations may be used when a relative index of fatness is required rather than high accuracy measures of body composition. Skinfold thickness measurements are better predictors of body fat percentage than other simple anthropometric variables or ratios such as the BMI (Sarría et al, 1998). In our study, Slaughter et al (1988) and Brook (1971) equations showed the lowest error and biases were not dependent on body fat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For groups, as other authors have recommended (Reilly et al, 1995;Wong et al, 2000;Moreno et al, 2003), skinfold thickness equations may be used when a relative index of fatness is required rather than high accuracy measures of body composition. Skinfold thickness measurements are better predictors of body fat percentage than other simple anthropometric variables or ratios such as the BMI (Sarría et al, 1998). In our study, Slaughter et al (1988) and Brook (1971) equations showed the lowest error and biases were not dependent on body fat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…There are a group of logarithmic (Durnin & Rahaman, 1967;Brook, 1971;Durnin & Womersley, 1974;Johnston et al, 1988;Deurenberg et al, 1990;Sarría et al, 1998) and linear equations (Sloan et al, 1962;Wilmore & Behnke, 1970) that predict the body density first, and then %FM from body density with any of the equations performed by Siri (1961), Lohman et al (1984) and Weststrate and Deurenberg (1989). Other groups of quadratic (Slaughter et al, 1988) and linear (Slaughter et al, 1988;Lean et al, 1996;Bray et al, 2001) equations predict %FM directly from skinfold thicknesses.…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although its validity across diverse samples of youth from different age, sex and ethnic groups has not been evaluated, it is used widely because of the relative ease and accuracy of the basic measurements (Malina and Katzmarzyk, 1999). Several studies have focused on validation of various anthropometric measures for assessing fatness and seem to recommend mostly BMI (Dietz and Bellizzi, 1999) and TSFT (Deurenberg et al, 1990;Sarria et al, 1998). Our observations show that prevalence of overweight children differs greatly with different indicators and it was lowest using TSFT cutoff but highest using percent body fat cutoff, in both sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study we have found that at the beginning of puberty the variables weight, height and BMI are more closely related to chronological age than to maturational stage. However, the BMI, which is widely used as an expression of adiposity (Guillaume, 1999) because its two components (weight and height) are more frequently measured than skinfold thickness, does not re¯ect the difference between the compartments of body composition (Sarrõ Âa et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%