2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body fat measurement in adolescents: comparison of skinfold thickness equations with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Abstract: Objective: To compare the most commonly used equations to predict body fatness from skinfold thickness, in male and female adolescents, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method of fatness measurement. Design: Cross-sectional nutrition survey. Setting: General adolescent population from Zaragoza (Spain). Subjects and methods: A total of 238 Caucasian adolescents (167 females and 113 males), aged 13.0-17.9 y, were recruited from 15 school groups in 11 public and private schools. The perc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
165
1
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
165
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Body fat percentage was calculated using Slaughter's equations, which showed the best agreement with total body fat percentage measured by DXA in adolescent population. 12 Identification of sexual maturation was assessed by a trained physician according to Tanner and Whitehouse. 13 PA was objectively measured by accelerometry (Actigraph GT1M, Pensacola, FL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body fat percentage was calculated using Slaughter's equations, which showed the best agreement with total body fat percentage measured by DXA in adolescent population. 12 Identification of sexual maturation was assessed by a trained physician according to Tanner and Whitehouse. 13 PA was objectively measured by accelerometry (Actigraph GT1M, Pensacola, FL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formula was chosen since it represents the best correlation with measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, considered the 'gold standard' to measure body fat mass (13) .…”
Section: Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most precise methods for assessing body composition, as well as local distribution of fat mass and fat-free mass are dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), 3 underwater weighing, 4 air displacement plethysmography, computer tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance. 5 However, these techniques are expensive and require sophisticated laboratory settings, which make them inappropriate to use in large epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%