New Developments in Biomedical Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.5772/7611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin Roughness Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the volar forearm, this lower variation does correspond to the greater consistency in dielectric constant found by [6]. Moreover, this site is also reported by Tchvialeva et al [8] to present the most consistent values of skin roughness, and the least variation with age and gender, of sites studied. Largely because of its importance to the cosmetics industry, skin roughness has been studied for many years using a variety of techniques, traditionally based on measurement of molded polymer replicas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the volar forearm, this lower variation does correspond to the greater consistency in dielectric constant found by [6]. Moreover, this site is also reported by Tchvialeva et al [8] to present the most consistent values of skin roughness, and the least variation with age and gender, of sites studied. Largely because of its importance to the cosmetics industry, skin roughness has been studied for many years using a variety of techniques, traditionally based on measurement of molded polymer replicas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These traditional techniques have significant limitations, however. The results in [8], obtained using a more recent technique based on optical speckle measurements, are useful in interpreting the present sub-millimeter scattering measurements because of their comparison of absolute rms roughness values from different body sites, ranging from 15 um to 50 um.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(Al) could be determined. For skin with Êskin w 130 kPa, trough ^ 140 ^im [11], average /irough ~ 55 ßm [12], and w^pace =0.65 mm, £7EES ~ 0.27 x 10"' N-m for FS-EES, M' .pecc =0.40 mm, EZEES ^4.6 x 10"^ N-m for IPS-EES, the localized deformation energy from Eq. (Al) is very small compared to the bending energy from Eq.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…)The interfacial adhesion energy is the work of adhesion multiplied by the contact area, case of /trough ~ ^Arough in experiments[8]. Minimization of the total energy then gives analytically the maximum deflection of EES as with Êskin « 130 kPa, Apough ~ 140 ßm[11] and average /¡rough ~ 55 ^im[12], and Eq. (11) gives the maximum deñection to be ~40 ßm foiJ^S-EES (£7EES ~ 0.27 x 10"' N-m) and 0.85 ßm for IPS-EES (£/EES ~ 4.6 x 10"^ N-m).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the noninvasive assessment of skin roughness, indirect replica-based techniques and direct in vivo techniques are in use [24,25]. Although fast and convenient direct methods that are appropriate for the clinical setting have been developed based on interference fringe profilometry and the use of CCD cameras [26,27,28], the preparation of replicas remains the most frequently used technique with a vast body of data available [3,4,5,8,10,12,13,17,18,29,30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%