2008
DOI: 10.4022/jafib.v1i1.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin Burn at the Site of Indifferent Electrode after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of AV Node for Atrial Fibrillation.

Abstract: IntroductionRadiofrequency (RF) energy is a low voltage high frequency electrical energy which produces controlled focal tissue ablation. It has revolutionised the treatment of refractory supraventricular tachycardias. Although radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a safe procedure, application of RF energy is not without complications. Major complications may occur in up to 3% of patients undergoing RFCA which includes AV block, Cardiac tamponade, Coronary artery spasm, thrombosis, Pericarditis, Vascular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential adverse events (AEs) are rarely reported but may include painful cutaneous hyperesthesia, dysesthesias and increased pain 4 5. Some reports suggest that cervical RFA can interfere with implantable electronic devices, such as stimulators or defibrillators; can cause dropped head syndrome; ataxia; or neuromuscular instability, and therefore, it is imperative to follow best practice recommendations to minimise the risk of AEs 9 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential adverse events (AEs) are rarely reported but may include painful cutaneous hyperesthesia, dysesthesias and increased pain 4 5. Some reports suggest that cervical RFA can interfere with implantable electronic devices, such as stimulators or defibrillators; can cause dropped head syndrome; ataxia; or neuromuscular instability, and therefore, it is imperative to follow best practice recommendations to minimise the risk of AEs 9 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly complications from RFA occur following solid tumour ablations and are less common following spinal (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) RFA. Complications include short-term paresthesias, worsening pain and skin burns, which are more common following cardiac or tumour RFA, while other spinal RFA procedures have relatively little incidence of burns 4 5. Third-degree full-thickness burns are a rare complication after RFA procedures, with an estimated incidence ranging between 0.1% and 3.2% 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increase of temperature at the catheter tip is the foundation of the therapy with RFA as it causes the local destruction of the tissue. Dispersive skin pads at the site of the indifferent electrode function to disperse the electrical energy exiting the body and thus prevent the occurrence of skin burns by spreading the energy over a larger surface area [ 3 ]. In prior studies, it has been predicted that the temperature rises to 45–47°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 3% of patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation develop major complications from the procedure. These complications include AV block, cardiac tamponade, coronary artery spasm, thrombosis, pericarditis, vascular injury, thromboembolism, TIA or stroke, pulmonary hypertension, pneumothorax, left atrial-esophageal fistula, and phrenic nerve paralysis [ 3 ]. Skin burns at the site of an indifferent electrode patch have been a rare, serious, and likely an underreported complication of RFA [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we identified only 5 other published reports on this subject, with a total of 12 patients sustaining burns. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 In reality, this complication is likely under-reported, and the true incidence is difficult to ascertain. The most comprehensive publication, to our knowledge, reported a skin burn incidence of 0.28% (6 out of 2167 consecutive RFA procedures).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%