2013
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin antisepsis survey in Australia–New Zealand neonatal nurseries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was variation in reported decontamination practices, including product selection, application and removal. Most decontamination agents reported contained a CHG based product, comparable with 60-90% CHG use in previous studies (Tamma et al, 2010;Shah and Tracy, 2013). The use of CHG products for patients less than 2-3 months of age remains controversial due to a high rate of skin complications (Ponnusamy et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was variation in reported decontamination practices, including product selection, application and removal. Most decontamination agents reported contained a CHG based product, comparable with 60-90% CHG use in previous studies (Tamma et al, 2010;Shah and Tracy, 2013). The use of CHG products for patients less than 2-3 months of age remains controversial due to a high rate of skin complications (Ponnusamy et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Evidence for best practice CVC insertion and management significantly outweighs PIVC management (Shah and Tracy, 2013;Sharpe et al, 2016). Recommendations for neonatal PIVC best practice are currently limited to cannula gauge size (Franck et al, 2001), fluids to avoid peripheral infusion (McCullen and Pieper, 2006), and consideration for PIVC complications (Legemaat et al, 2016;Tandale et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 Another survey from Australia and New Zealand revealed aqueous CHG to be the most commonly used antiseptic in preterm population (72%) while the alcohol-based CHG to be the most used for full-term infants (56%). 11 Our high rate of skin burns among CHG-using units is not surprising. The local adverse effects of CHG in neonates are well known and were frequently reported in the literature especially in preterm infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nach nordamerikanischen Publikationen nimmt (trotz eines entsprechenden Warnhinweises der Food and Drug Administration zum Einsatz bei Kindern mit einem Lebensalter unter 2 Monaten) der Einsatz von CHX bei Frühgeborenen in den USA zu [117,[120][121][122][123][124]. Allerdings bestätigen diese Studien die transkutane Resorption von CHX bei Frühgebo-renen [125,126].…”
Section: Hautantisepsis Vor Invasiven Maßnahmenunclassified