2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-7067-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sketch recognition using transfer learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed scheme classification accuracy (72.93%) also beats the classification accuracy obtained by LeNet (55.2%) [17], HOG‐SVM (accuracy rate 56%) [3], sketch classification accuracy (61.5%) by Ensemble matching [22], Multi‐Kernel SVM (65.8%) [24], AlexNet‐SVM (67.1%) [14], and Fisher vector SP (68.9%) [9], in the literature study. Furthermore, the achieved results are also compared with most recent deep CNNs studies with classification accuracies (72.82%) [10], (72.5%) [18], and (69.17%) [19]. The proposed scheme also achieves competitive results as compared to human accuracy (73.1%) [3] for sketch recognition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed scheme classification accuracy (72.93%) also beats the classification accuracy obtained by LeNet (55.2%) [17], HOG‐SVM (accuracy rate 56%) [3], sketch classification accuracy (61.5%) by Ensemble matching [22], Multi‐Kernel SVM (65.8%) [24], AlexNet‐SVM (67.1%) [14], and Fisher vector SP (68.9%) [9], in the literature study. Furthermore, the achieved results are also compared with most recent deep CNNs studies with classification accuracies (72.82%) [10], (72.5%) [18], and (69.17%) [19]. The proposed scheme also achieves competitive results as compared to human accuracy (73.1%) [3] for sketch recognition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Sert et al. [18] analyses different CNN architectures adapting the transfer learning approach for sketch recognition. In this framework, an early fusion of different layers using PCA for feature reduction and RBF‐SVM classifier was observed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e performance of the MSVM-based SKETRACK is evaluated on online diagram databases. e results obtained on FC and FA diagram instances are compared with that of three state-of-the-art methods: multiclass SVM [24,25], CNN [31], and CNN-SVM [37] while SVM [46,47] is only compared with the proposed MSVM results for the DLC diagrams due to lack of more existing methods. e two main reasons for the less research on DLC sketches and their limited capacity are as follows: (1) the complexity of the DLC sketches and (2) the inability to adapt with the quality of input employed.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sketrack Recognition Results With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is approach has better recognition performance due to the consideration of the unique properties of the sketches. In order to outperform Sketch-a-Net, Sert and Boyacı [37] proposed an efficient freehand sketch recognition approach using transfer learning models based on the feature-level fusion of CNN along with CNN-SVM pipeline architecture. e principal component analysis (PCA) is utilized to reduce the fused deep feature dimensions and increase the overall recognition accuracy to 73.1% on the TU-Berlin dataset [1] for smartphone applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the game stopped when it recognized the category of the drawing sketch which is the same as the category of the prompt by the system. In 2018, Sert [18] designed and implemented an application to identify sketches in smart devices. The application contained two modules: a sketch recognition program and a sketch application on mobile phones.…”
Section: Sketch Recognition Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%