2018
DOI: 10.1101/341735
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SKEMPI 2.0: An updated benchmark of changes in protein-protein binding energy, kinetics and thermodynamics upon mutation

Abstract: Motivation: Understanding the relationship between the sequence, structure, binding energy, binding kinetics and binding thermodynamics of protein-protein interactions is crucial to understanding cellular signaling, the assembly and regulation of molecular complexes, the mechanisms through which mutations lead to disease, and protein engineering. Results: We present SKEMPI 2.0, a major update to our database of binding free energy changes upon mutation for structurally resolved protein-protein interactions. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the longitudinal mutant simulations, we obtained an attenuation factor on the order of 10 6 to 10 7 . This attenuation is consistent with the fact that the mutation adds bulky charged residues in place of smaller neutral ones and with the observation that the mutant cannot assemble MTs by itself (32), and it is plausible, given that single mutations are commonly observed to decrease binding affinity by 3 or more orders of magnitude (45). Even with attenuation factors that completely canceled the lateral interface contribution to binding affinity for the mutant tubulin that is present at <1% of the total, we were unable to recapitulate the decrease in growth rates observed experimentally in the presence of a small fraction of that mutant (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Mutant Tubulins With Perturbed Binding Interfacesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For the longitudinal mutant simulations, we obtained an attenuation factor on the order of 10 6 to 10 7 . This attenuation is consistent with the fact that the mutation adds bulky charged residues in place of smaller neutral ones and with the observation that the mutant cannot assemble MTs by itself (32), and it is plausible, given that single mutations are commonly observed to decrease binding affinity by 3 or more orders of magnitude (45). Even with attenuation factors that completely canceled the lateral interface contribution to binding affinity for the mutant tubulin that is present at <1% of the total, we were unable to recapitulate the decrease in growth rates observed experimentally in the presence of a small fraction of that mutant (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Mutant Tubulins With Perturbed Binding Interfacesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For the longitudinal mutant simulations, we obtained an attenuation factor on the order of 10 6 -10 7 . This attenuation is consistent with the observation that the double mutant cannot assemble MTs by itself (32), and is plausible given that single mutations are commonly observed to decrease binding affinity by three or more orders of magnitude (43). Even with attenuation factors that completely cancel the lateral interface contribution to binding affinity, we were unable to recapitulate the decrease in growth rates observed for that mutant (Fig S8).…”
Section: A Computational Kinetic Model Supports a Slow Tubulin On-ratsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…NetTree integrates the advantages of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and gradient-boosting trees (GBT), such that CNN is treated as an intermediate model that converts vectorized element-and site-specific persistent homology features into a higher-level abstract feature, and GBT uses the upstream features and other biochemistry features for prediction. The performance test of tenfold crossvalidation on the dataset (SKEMPI 2.0 [19]) carried out using gradient boosted regression trees (GBRTs). The errors with the SKEMPI2.0 dataset are 0.85 in terms of Pearson correlations coefficient (R p ) and 1.11 kcal/mol in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) [36].…”
Section: Topology-based Machine Learning Prediction Of Protein-proteimentioning
confidence: 99%