2006
DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-211-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-resolved source apportionment of ambient particles by positive matrix factorization at Gosan background site in East Asia

Abstract: Abstract. Size-and time-resolved aerosol samples were collected using an eight-stage Davis rotating unit for monitoring (DRUM) sampler from 29 March to 29 May in 2002 at Gosan, Jeju Island, Korea, which is one of the representative background sites in East Asia. These samples were analyzed using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence for 3-h average concentrations of 19 elements consisting of S, Si, Al, Fe, Ca, Cl, Cu, Zn, Ti, K, Mn, Pb, Ni, V, Se, As, Rb, Cr, Br. The size-resolved data sets were then analyzed using t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…À0.6 or À0.4) were selected. This profile, tentatively called 'mixed combustion', is in fair agreement with the ones found by Han et al (2006) in sub-micron sized aerosol. This source accounted for 32% of PM1 mass in MI, 12% in FL, and 49% in GE; it presented a seasonal trend, with much higher (about three times) values in winter.…”
Section: Mixed Combustion Florencesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…À0.6 or À0.4) were selected. This profile, tentatively called 'mixed combustion', is in fair agreement with the ones found by Han et al (2006) in sub-micron sized aerosol. This source accounted for 32% of PM1 mass in MI, 12% in FL, and 49% in GE; it presented a seasonal trend, with much higher (about three times) values in winter.…”
Section: Mixed Combustion Florencesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Factor analytical methods have been applied to chemically speciated aerosol data for more than forty years to identify the sources of particles in urban and rural environments (e.g., Blifford and Meeker, 1967;Thurston and Spengler, 1985;Schauer et al, 1996;Chow and Watson, 2002;Engel-Cox and Weber, 2007;Reff et al, 2007;Viana et al, 2008). Size-resolved concentrations have also been included in some analyses, but comparatively few researchers have simultaneously factored chemical composition data from particles in different size ranges (Yakovleva et al, 1999;Dillner et al, 2005;Han et al, 2006;Pere-Trepat et al, 2007;Yatkin and Bayram, 2008;Amato et al, 2009;Gietl and Klemm, 2009;Karanasiou et al, 2009;Kleeman et al, 2009;Srivastava et al, 2009). All of these studies used data with limited size or temporal resolution, typically 2-6 size ranges and 12-24-h average composition data; the study with the highest size and time resolution had 8 size ranges and 3-hour time resolution (Han et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size-resolved concentrations have also been included in some analyses, but comparatively few researchers have simultaneously factored chemical composition data from particles in different size ranges (Yakovleva et al, 1999;Dillner et al, 2005;Han et al, 2006;Pere-Trepat et al, 2007;Yatkin and Bayram, 2008;Amato et al, 2009;Gietl and Klemm, 2009;Karanasiou et al, 2009;Kleeman et al, 2009;Srivastava et al, 2009). All of these studies used data with limited size or temporal resolution, typically 2-6 size ranges and 12-24-h average composition data; the study with the highest size and time resolution had 8 size ranges and 3-hour time resolution (Han et al, 2006). In fact, Larson et al (2006) noted that their approach of combining number size distributions with bulk aerosol composition measurements in a factorization analysis was an interim approach until more size-resolved aerosol composition data from aerosol mass spectrometry was available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest element in Rotmat indicated maximum uncertainty of rotation at the corresponding Fpeak value (Lee et al, 1999). Generally optimum degree of rotational freedom can be determined with preserving a certain limit of Q values (Song et al, 2001;Kim et al, 2003;Han et al, 2006). Optimum modeling conditions for Fpeak and Q value used in our study are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Data Treatment and Pmf Modeilingmentioning
confidence: 99%