2003
DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2003.10593311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Matters: Organisational Culture in Small, Medium, and Large Australian Organisations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sub cultures of this dimension are stability and social responsibility (Gray, Densten & Sarros 2003). In organisations, stability sub culture emphasises stability, execution of regulations and internal maintenance, and strives for consistency and control through clear tasks (Bashayreh 2009;Nel 2009).…”
Section: External Environment Dimension Of Organisational Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sub cultures of this dimension are stability and social responsibility (Gray, Densten & Sarros 2003). In organisations, stability sub culture emphasises stability, execution of regulations and internal maintenance, and strives for consistency and control through clear tasks (Bashayreh 2009;Nel 2009).…”
Section: External Environment Dimension Of Organisational Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, their culture is stronger and they are perceived to be considerably more stable than medium-sized or large enterprises. On the other hand, however, "SMEs are handicapped ISSN 2183-0606 http://www.open-jim.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 by 'resource poverty' resulting from financial constraints, lack of professional expertise, and the lack of material and human resources" (Gray et al, 2003). Nevertheless, benefiting from foreign cultures should be a perk regardless of the enterprise size, which would imply that encouraging enterprises towards OI projects in order to leverage this perk would be a notable managerial implication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, small organizations were found to have more positive organizational culture, more consultative management, and their employees had higher morale (Connell, 2001). Also, small organizations were found to be more flexible, with less bureaucracy and less rigidity in decision making (Carlsson, 1999;Kuratko, Goodale, & Hornsby, 2001;Gray, Densten, & Sarros, 2003). However, as small organizations usually have limited human and financial resources and lack wide professional expertise, they tend to be less able to invest in training and development, respond to challenges, or absorb market fluctuations than their large counterparts (McAdam, 2000;Thong & Yap, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%