2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Matters: Analyses of Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblages Across Differing Size Fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the objectives of this study, we chose to use only 0.150 mm for all groups studied. According to Cappelli and Austin (2019), the benthic foraminiferal assemblages picked from the large size fraction (> 150 mm) still provide useful information on prevailing environmental conditions and remain useful for an overview of environmental change. Well-preserved specimens of each morphotype were photographed and examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) PHENOM XL at Laboratório de Micropaleontologia Aplicada (LMA) of Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the objectives of this study, we chose to use only 0.150 mm for all groups studied. According to Cappelli and Austin (2019), the benthic foraminiferal assemblages picked from the large size fraction (> 150 mm) still provide useful information on prevailing environmental conditions and remain useful for an overview of environmental change. Well-preserved specimens of each morphotype were photographed and examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) PHENOM XL at Laboratório de Micropaleontologia Aplicada (LMA) of Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzes were performed using standard methods, which using a solution of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2 3%) in sample preparation [26] to remove organic matters [27]. Samples were sieved by a 63 μm mesh, the residues oven-dried at <60°C, weighed and sieved into 63-150 μm and >150 μm size fractions [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species with relative abundances greater than 10% are considered abundant, those between 5 and 10% are considered common, and those below 5% are considered rare (Lo Giudice Cappelli and Austin, 2019). For all studied assemblages, species diversity, expressed as Species richness (S), the Fisher α-index, the Shannon H-index (which considers both the abundance and evenness of species), and dominance (Simpson and Berger-Parker indices) were calculated.…”
Section: Sensitivementioning
confidence: 99%