2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2017-80299-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects of the magnetic anisotropy of fcc cobalt nanoparticles embedded in copper

Abstract: Cobalt nanoparticles embedded in copper matrices show strong size effects in the magnetic anisotropy with a non-monotonous dependence on the particle diameter. In this article we discuss quantitative values of the magnetic anisotropy in the frame of two models: in small clusters the surface anisotropy contribution dominates whereas larger particles (> 3 nm diameter) have an elliptic shape leading to increased shape anisotropy. The crystalline structure of the particles is shown to be face-centered cubic, justi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite similar to what has been observed in figure 6(b) at low temperatures (∼50 K), a change in the general trend of H K is documented for ferrites [72]. Figures 6(c) and (d) illustrates the decreasing general trend of the anisotropy field with size in both high and low temperatures which has been observed in different types of nanoparticle structures including iron oxide [75][76][77]. To better understand these changes, as well as many others, more in-depth studies are required.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Quite similar to what has been observed in figure 6(b) at low temperatures (∼50 K), a change in the general trend of H K is documented for ferrites [72]. Figures 6(c) and (d) illustrates the decreasing general trend of the anisotropy field with size in both high and low temperatures which has been observed in different types of nanoparticle structures including iron oxide [75][76][77]. To better understand these changes, as well as many others, more in-depth studies are required.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is because the effective magnetic energy barrier of nanoparticles results from various contributions, namely, cubic magnetocrystalline, surface, shape and magnetoelastic anisotropy. Recent results indicate, that for Co nanoparticles with D < 3 nm the surface anisotropy is dominating, whereas for larger nanoparticles ( D > 3 nm) the shape anisotropy is decisive . It has been also found experimentally that for nearly spherical 20 nm fcc‐Co nanoparticles the presence of planar defects, such as twin boundaries and stacking faults, alter the magnetocrystalline anisotropy leading to dominating shape anisotropy that should be of the order of 10 5 erg/cm 3 (10 4 J m −3 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ fcc cobalt. Ii is well known 39,40,42,43 that in addition to hcp cobalt nanoparticles, cobalt nanoparticles with fcc crystal structure can also be found in the experiment. For completeness, we calculate single-domain diameters for cobalt nanoparticles with fcc crystal structure having cubic type of magnetic anisotropy.…”
Section: Two Domain Configurationmentioning
confidence: 88%