Fuel Cell Catalysis 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470463772.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Effects in Electrocatalysis of Fuel Cell Reactions on Supported Metal Nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 262 publications
(454 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10b) are in agreement with the TEM observations of the different catalysts. The reference material shows a single peak which is the fingerprint of a very well-dispersed catalyst [39,40], as evidenced in the representative TEM images of Fig. 9.…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetry In Supporting Electrolyte and Co-strippingmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10b) are in agreement with the TEM observations of the different catalysts. The reference material shows a single peak which is the fingerprint of a very well-dispersed catalyst [39,40], as evidenced in the representative TEM images of Fig. 9.…”
Section: Cyclic Voltammetry In Supporting Electrolyte and Co-strippingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is well known that ORR is a structure-sensitive reaction, and in that respect, platinum particle size plays a major role. The lower particle size presents a larger fraction of lowcoordinated sites on their surface which strongly adsorb ORR intermediates thus impacting negatively the activity [40,42]. It is therefore not surprising to obtain a higher specific activity in the case of the CA-supported electrocatalysts, owing to their larger Pt particles size [42].…”
Section: Orr Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fivefold enhancement factor was found in single PEMFC test but shall be considered with caution. Indeed, kinetic measurements in solid electrolyte are associated with a number of limitations, which prevent correct determination of SA 0.90 : [61] (i) incomplete utilization of the catalyst, (ii) interference of the anode and the cathode (finite permeability of the Nafion ® membrane), and (iii) Ohmic and mass-transport losses (thus effectiveness factor below 1). Note however that the values of the apparent activation energy determined from least regressions at E = 0.90 V vs. RHE (22 and 24 kJ mol −1 for the solid Pt/C and the hollow PtNi/C electrocatalysts, respectively) agreed with those obtained by Damjanovic et al [62] (bulk Pt, E = 0.80 V vs. RHE, 25 kJ mol −1 ) and Paulus et al [63] (Pt/C, E = 0.90 V vs. RHE, 26 kJ mol −1 ).…”
Section: Structure-activity Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the data were normalized with respect to surface Pt area, this implies that the specific electrocatalytic properties change during the dissolution. Changes like those in the figure may be due to the structure of the catalyst particles (development of steps, edges, and facets [30,31,32]), size effects [33,34,35], or the average distance between the catalyst particles [36] developing differently during the dissolution-redeposition process. (We attempted to take particle size effects explicitly into account in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%