2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size does matter: The life cycle of Steinernema spp. in micro-insect hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, all laboratory bioassays were performed with second instar larvae. First and second instar larvae are known to be less susceptible to EPNs than larger larvae (third and fourth instars), presumably due to their small size which hinders the ability of EPNs to locate and penetrate these larvae, and therefore killing fewer hosts (Bastidas, Portillo, & San-Blas, 2014;Ebssa, & Koppenhöfer, 2012). However, the contrary has also been documented, with smaller larvae found to be more susceptible to EPNs (Salari, Karimi, Sadeghi-Nameghi, & Hosseini, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, all laboratory bioassays were performed with second instar larvae. First and second instar larvae are known to be less susceptible to EPNs than larger larvae (third and fourth instars), presumably due to their small size which hinders the ability of EPNs to locate and penetrate these larvae, and therefore killing fewer hosts (Bastidas, Portillo, & San-Blas, 2014;Ebssa, & Koppenhöfer, 2012). However, the contrary has also been documented, with smaller larvae found to be more susceptible to EPNs (Salari, Karimi, Sadeghi-Nameghi, & Hosseini, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar study by Van Damme et al (2015), S. feltiae and S. carpocapsae caused the highest mortality of T. absoluta for all larval stadia pooled (79% and 80%, respectively), whereas H. bacteriophora (60%) did not perform as well. Bastidas et al (2014) identified the importance of the size of the target insect, as well as that of the EPN species used against it. They found that although all the steinernematids screened were able to invade small insect hosts, the invasion potential decreased as the target insect's size decreased and the EPN species' size increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indica, H. noenieputensis, and H. baujardi in the present study might be attributed to their relatively small body size. Comparatively small hosts are speculated to limit the development of the invading nematodes, while the presence of relatively large hosts is necessary for the longterm persistence of the nematodes (Bastidas et al, 2014). This raises concerns regarding adequate and persistent control of H. capensis under field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some insects, the usual routes of entry may be inaccessible because the mouth may be obstructed by oral filters (wireworms) or may be too narrow (insects with sucking/piercing mouthparts or small insects with chewing mouthparts). The anus may be constricted by muscles or other structures (wireworms), and the spiracles may be covered with septa (wireworms) or sieve plates (scarab grubs) (Forschler & Gardner, 1991) or simply be too narrow for nematode entry (some dipterans and lepidopterans, especially during early instars) (Bastidas, Edgar, & San Blas, 2014). Insects reduce the probability of nematode infection by several actions: they obstruct their anus with a large amount of fecal material (scarab grubs), minimize their CO 2 output or release CO 2 in intermittent bursts that minimize the presence of chemical cues (lepidopterous pupae and scarab grubs), and generate impenetrable cocoons or soil cells before pupation that serve as physical barriers (many lepidopterans, scarabs, and weevils) (Hazir, Kaya, Stock, & Keskin, 2003).…”
Section: Behavioral Interactions Between Entomopathogenic Nematodes Amentioning
confidence: 99%