2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1781177
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-Dependent Eshelby’s Tensor for Embedded Nano-Inclusions Incorporating Surface/Interface Energies

Abstract: The classical formulation of Eshelby (Proc. Royal Society, A241, p. 376, 1957) for embedded inclusions is revisited and modified by incorporating the previously excluded surface/interface stresses, tension and energies. The latter effects come into prominence at inclusion sizes in the nanometer range. Unlike the classical result, our modified formulation renders the elastic state of an embedded inclusion size-dependent making possible the extension of Eshelby’s original formalism to nano-inclusions. We present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
221
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
221
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the nanoscale, however, this ratio becomes important and the surface induces sizedependent elastic fields that are long-range. 66 One would expect the surfaces to induce a size-dependent strain-field and to distort the core atoms for the nanocrystal sizes investigated in this work. However, the stiffness of Si nanocrystals and the absence of reconstruction of the hydrogen-passivated surfaces result in distortions that are smaller than the displacement tolerance.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At the nanoscale, however, this ratio becomes important and the surface induces sizedependent elastic fields that are long-range. 66 One would expect the surfaces to induce a size-dependent strain-field and to distort the core atoms for the nanocrystal sizes investigated in this work. However, the stiffness of Si nanocrystals and the absence of reconstruction of the hydrogen-passivated surfaces result in distortions that are smaller than the displacement tolerance.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Analytical methods for modeling reinforced composite materials considering imperfect interface conditions have been developed recently [149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162][163]. Also, the importance of the interphase zone in modeling composite materials has been discussed in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional modeling via the use of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) ignores the contributions of surface energies, surface tension and surface stresses. The high surface area to volume ratio present at the nanoscale dictates that any continuum-based model of deformation should incorporate the separate contribution of surface mechanics (Sharma and Ganti, 2004). Recently, the continuum-based surface/interface model proposed by Gurtin, Murdoch and co-workers (Gurtin and Murdoch, 1975; Gurtin et al, 1998) has been incorporated in the analysis of several typical crack problems (see for example, Kim et al, 2010Kim et al, , 2011aAntipov and Schiavone, 2011;Wang, 2015;Wang andSchiavone, 2015, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%