2017
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2017.1334669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and temperature characteristics of potatoes help predict injury following impact collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impact damage is the result of short-duration mechanical forces occurred during drops, knocks, and collisions, which is responsible for lowering the quality of potato tubers. [1] What's more, impact damage of potato is the common phenomenon in the phase of harvesting, sorting, grading, and packing, where the phase of harvesting presents the serious physical injure of potato. It was reported that 70% of the total damage was caused by harvesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Impact damage is the result of short-duration mechanical forces occurred during drops, knocks, and collisions, which is responsible for lowering the quality of potato tubers. [1] What's more, impact damage of potato is the common phenomenon in the phase of harvesting, sorting, grading, and packing, where the phase of harvesting presents the serious physical injure of potato. It was reported that 70% of the total damage was caused by harvesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the harvesting damage of potato, some scholars used an instrumented sphere to develop a model of predictive tissue discoloration and to study the abrasion rate of potato tubers in the field experiments. [1,[3][4][5] In terms of simulation, Sang Yongying obtained the collision force curves of potato by ADAMS software. [6] Other researchers used ANSYS software to simulate the collision process between potato and rigid surface and obtained the potato impact damage thresholds [7,8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that an increase of 1 F in soil temperature would lead to the increased force of about 2% to bruise (as measured by height) by Johnston & Wilson (Johnston & Wilson, 1969). Besides, this variation trend of damaged area is in agreement with that of bruised depth and volume (Mathew & Hyde, 1997;McRae et al, 1976;Thomson & Lopresti, 2018). However, the values of acceleration changed in accordance with V-shape curve with the elevated potato temperature (Table 2).…”
Section: Effect Of Tuber Temperature On Collision Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Generally, the potatoes were vulnerable to impact injury in the case of colder temperature. Mathew and Hyde reported that a 200 mm drop onto steel caused injury in almost 50% of potato tubers at 10 C, whereas this was reduced to 28% when tuber temperature was 21 C (Mathew & Hyde, 1997;McRae, Carruthers, & Porteous, 1976;Thomson & Lopresti, 2018). It was found that an increase of 1 F in soil temperature would lead to the increased force of about 2% to bruise (as measured by height) by Johnston & Wilson (Johnston & Wilson, 1969).…”
Section: Effect Of Tuber Temperature On Collision Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an American study, 70% of potato damage is caused by harvesting, 30% during transport and storage (Peters, 1996). The impact acceleration of potato not only has a positive correlation with its damage (Thomson and Lopresti, 2018;Xie, 2020a), but also is the key parameter to the study of potato impact kinematics and dynamics. Researchers have adopted experimental studies 1 to analyze the potato mechanical impact and bruising based on various instruments including pendulum collision device, free drop collision device, electronic potato, instrumented sphere and acceleration measuring unit (Canneyt et al, 2004;Dănilă, 2015;Deng et al, 2020;Geyer et al, 2009;Hyde et al, 1992;Mathew and Hyde, 1997;Nikara et al, 2018;Rady and Soliman, 2015;Strehmel et al, 2010;Xie et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2020a;Xie et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%