1999
DOI: 10.3386/w7275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size and Growth of Japanese Plants in the United States

Abstract: We thank David Haushalter, Van Kolpin, and Wes Wilson for helpful comments on an earlier draft. We gratefully thank Keith Head and John Ries for sharing their electronic version of the main database we use for this study. Any errors or omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth and size gaps are explicitly studied by Kumar (1984), Blonigen & Tomlin (1999) and Oulton (1998a). Howenstine and Zeile (1992) Contrary to such results, comparing purely domestic UK-firms and UK-firms with FDI, Kumar (1984) shows, that the degree of overseas operations has no strong influence on profitability or growth.…”
Section: A Review Of Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth and size gaps are explicitly studied by Kumar (1984), Blonigen & Tomlin (1999) and Oulton (1998a). Howenstine and Zeile (1992) Contrary to such results, comparing purely domestic UK-firms and UK-firms with FDI, Kumar (1984) shows, that the degree of overseas operations has no strong influence on profitability or growth.…”
Section: A Review Of Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same database,Blonigen and Tomlin (1998) also provide evidence that Japanese automobile parts plants grew much more rapidly during this period than other Japanese manufacturing plants in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In recent years, MNEs attracted increasing attention in the theoretical and empirical IO‐literature. In particular, one strand within the empirical firm growth literature argues that firm growth dynamics differ between purely domestically oriented companies and subsidiaries of MNEs (see, Buckley et al ., ; Cantwell and Sanna‐Randaccio, ; Bloningen and Tomlin, ; Pearce, ; Belderbos and Zou, ; Papanastassiou et al ., ; Oberhofer and Pfaffermayr, ) . Furthermore, exporting firms as well as MNEs are exposed to different domestic and non‐domestic business type fluctuations.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%