2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2012.00583.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm Growth, European Industry Dynamics and Domestic Business Cycles

Abstract: Based on the empirical firm growth literature and on heterogeneous (microeconomic) adjustment models, this paper empirically investigates the impact of European industry fluctuations and domestic business cycles on the growth performance of European firms. Since the implementation of the Single market program (SMP) the EU 27 member states share a common market. Accordingly, the European industry business cycle is expected to become a more influential predictor of European firms' behavior at the expense of dome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient for the number of observed years is not reported. In line with typical estimation results from empirical firm growth equations á la Gibrat's law (see, e.g., Coad 2009 andOberhofer 2012), the average intensive margin employment growth rate was largest in the initially smallest firms. The empirical results show that a one percent increase in the initial firm size (i.e., the firm size at the first observed year) decreases the average annual job creation rate by 5.3 to 7.9 percentage points.…”
Section: Job Creation At the Firm Level And Business Environment Percsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The coefficient for the number of observed years is not reported. In line with typical estimation results from empirical firm growth equations á la Gibrat's law (see, e.g., Coad 2009 andOberhofer 2012), the average intensive margin employment growth rate was largest in the initially smallest firms. The empirical results show that a one percent increase in the initial firm size (i.e., the firm size at the first observed year) decreases the average annual job creation rate by 5.3 to 7.9 percentage points.…”
Section: Job Creation At the Firm Level And Business Environment Percsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On the one hand, the state of the economy directly determines profitable business opportunities, rendering economic upturns periods of strong demand, characterized by more favorable growth prospects and generally higher firm growth (Liedholm 2002;Oberhofer 2010). On the other hand, the regulatory and institutional environment shapes and determines business and the growth opportunities of establishments, and may adversely affect an establishment's growth prospects.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of GDP per capita is negatively correlated with the financial constraints met by the SMEs in the developing countries (Rajan & Zingales, 1998;Liedholm, 2002;Oberhofer, 2010;Fowowe, 2017). Thus, fewer financing constraints can be observed at SMEs operating in more developed countries with higher GDP ratios, compared with developing and less developed countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%