2017
DOI: 10.1177/1526602817710770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Six-Month Results From the Initial Randomized Study of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in the Femoropopliteal Segment

Abstract: , on behalf of the RANGER SFA InvestigatorsAbstract Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the Ranger paclitaxel-coated balloon vs uncoated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions. Methods: Between January 2014 and October 2015, the prospective, randomized RANGER SFA study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02013193) enrolled 105 patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia (Rutherford category 2-4) and stenotic lesions in the nonstented femoropopliteal segment at 10 European centers. Seventy-one pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study revealed superiority of DEB over PTA (patency rate 83.9% [188 of 224] in DEB vs. 60.6% [40 of 66] in PTA group; p < 0.001). 9 The result is also consistent with studies by Ott et al, 10 Giacoppo et al (2016), 11 Bausback et al, 12 Tepe et al (2018), 13 and MDT-2113 SFA trial 14 that showed superiority of DEB angioplasty over plain balloon angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This study revealed superiority of DEB over PTA (patency rate 83.9% [188 of 224] in DEB vs. 60.6% [40 of 66] in PTA group; p < 0.001). 9 The result is also consistent with studies by Ott et al, 10 Giacoppo et al (2016), 11 Bausback et al, 12 Tepe et al (2018), 13 and MDT-2113 SFA trial 14 that showed superiority of DEB angioplasty over plain balloon angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, this process is not automatically comparable to higher transfer of drugs to the vessel wall. Differences can be caused by the excipient intended to optimize paclitaxel microcrystallinity 27 . For Stellarex and Lutonix 035 it can be seen that the excipient binds the drug very strongly for a slower dissolution rate 23 , 28 and that, even with the greatest force, hardly any drug is released.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated 126 abstracts from which 68 full text publications were reviewed in detail. Following rigorous examination, 29 studies were included in the network meta‐analysis (Figure ) . These studies included 4,820 patients with a mean study follow‐up of 22 ± 14 months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%