2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SITVITWEB – A publicly available international multimarker database for studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
443
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(467 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
19
443
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1C). Variants of the SIT627 spoligotype pattern in the SITVIT2 database (Demay et al, 2012) are almost only isolated from Japanese patients as shown in Fig. S1B.…”
Section: Current Knowledge On Tuberculosis Evolution Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1C). Variants of the SIT627 spoligotype pattern in the SITVIT2 database (Demay et al, 2012) are almost only isolated from Japanese patients as shown in Fig. S1B.…”
Section: Current Knowledge On Tuberculosis Evolution Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ninety-five culture isolates were unsuitable for DNA extraction and therefore they were not genotyped. Four hundred and eighty seven culturepositive isolates were genotyped, using an internationally standardised method for spoligotyping (Kamerbeck et al, 1997;Demay, 2012). Isolates were classified into strain families of the M. tuberculosis complex according to their spoligotype signature.…”
Section: Spoligotyping and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lineages 1 and 3 show a more restricted geographical distribution limited to East Africa, India, and the shores of the Indian Ocean. The strains of lineage 1 and lineage 3 include EAI and CAS spoligotype clusters, respectively, and the EAI spoligotype cluster is accepted as containing the "ancient" M. tuberculosis strains (20). In this study, no isolate belonging to the EAI family was found and only 0.9% (4/470) of all isolates belonged to the CAS family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%