Situational Perception

Horstmann, Kai T.; Ziegler, Matthias

doi:10.1002/9781119173489.ch3

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 50 publications

(44 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…State sociality thus reflects characteristics of the current situation (Rauthmann, 2015; Rauthmann et al, 2014). Assessing situational characteristics instead of situational cues is a valid way of gauging the influence of momentary situations (Horstmann & Ziegler, 2016; Parrigon et al, 2017; Rauthmann, 2015). State sociality was assessed using the S8–I (Rauthmann & Sherman, 2016b).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling dynamic personality theories in a continuous‐time framework: An illustration

Hecht

Horstmann

Arnold

et al. 2022

Journal of Personality

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personality psychology has traditionally focused on stable between-person differences. Yet, recent theoretical developments and empirical insights have led to a new conceptualization of personality as a dynamic system (e.g., Cybernetic Big Five Theory). Such dynamic systems comprise several components that need to be conceptually distinguished and mapped to a statistical model for estimation. In the current work, we illustrate how common components from these new dynamic personality theories may be implemented in a continuous-time modeling framework. As an empirical example, we use experience sampling data from N = 180 persons (with on average T = 40 [SD = 8] measurement occasions) to investigate four different effects between momentary happiness, momentary extraverted behavior, and the perception of a situation as social: (1) between-person effects, (2) contemporaneous effects,(3) autoregressive effects, and (4) cross-lagged effects. We highlight that these four effects must not necessarily point in the same direction, which is in line with assumptions from dynamic personality theories.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling dynamic personality theories in a continuous‐time framework: An illustration

Hecht

Horstmann

Arnold

et al. 2022

Journal of Personality

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ziegler and Horstmann (2015; Horstmann & Ziegler, 2016) described a model of situation perception which underlies the current work. The idea is that situation cues are processed by each individual in any given situation.…”

Section: What Influences Situation Perception?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality in situations: Going beyond the OCEAN and introducing the Situation Five.

Ziegler

Horstmann

Ziegler

2019

Psychological Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Already for almost a century, psychologists have postulated that human behavior is a function of both the person and the situation (Funder, 2016; Horstmann & Ziegler, 2016; Lewin, 1936, 1951). However, while psychologically important characteristics of persons have been studied exhaustively by personality psychologists, a similar characterization of situations has been remarkably absent until recently (Rauthmann et al., 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Person-situation dynamics in educational contexts: A self- and other-rated experience sampling study of teachers’ states, traits, and situations

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The situations people find themselves in and how they experience them is fundamental to a host of life and work outcomes. However, most research has so far only relied on self-reports and is thus not able to disentangle different situation components. The present study therefore examined the dynamics between self- and other-rated situation characteristics, personality traits, and personality states in an educational setting. One hundred and seventy-three student teachers ( n = 2244–2261 observations) and 94 supervisors ( n = 1110–1122 observations) participated in a 13- or 14-day experience sampling study during student teachers’ internships and rated situations and teachers’ personality states twice daily. Answering three research questions yielded that (1) self-rated traits were mostly not associated with self- or supervisor-rated situation characteristics; (2) self- and supervisor-rated situation characteristics predicted self- and supervisor-rated personality state expressions (although effects were largest for same-rater associations); and (3) there were no interaction effects of traits and situation characteristics on personality state expressions. These results have important theoretical and applied implications as they advance our understanding of person-situation dynamics in an applied setting and suggest that associations between situations and personality states are not solely attributable to common rater effects.

show abstract

Situational Perception

Cited by 12 publications

References 50 publications

Modeling dynamic personality theories in a continuous‐time framework: An illustration

Modeling dynamic personality theories in a continuous‐time framework: An illustration

Personality in situations: Going beyond the OCEAN and introducing the Situation Five.

Person-situation dynamics in educational contexts: A self- and other-rated experience sampling study of teachers’ states, traits, and situations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About