PsycTESTS Dataset 2019
DOI: 10.1037/t74142-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situational Judgement Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a central aspect of students' competences to regulate their own motivation, we assessed conditional motivational regulation strategy knowledge with a situational judgment test (Steuer et al 2016). Such a testing approach is suitable not only to assess facets of the competence behind actual regulation behaviors, but also to overcome methodical limitations of self-reports of these behaviors (see, e. g., Maag Merki et al 2013).…”
Section: Conditional Motivational Regulation Strategy Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a central aspect of students' competences to regulate their own motivation, we assessed conditional motivational regulation strategy knowledge with a situational judgment test (Steuer et al 2016). Such a testing approach is suitable not only to assess facets of the competence behind actual regulation behaviors, but also to overcome methodical limitations of self-reports of these behaviors (see, e. g., Maag Merki et al 2013).…”
Section: Conditional Motivational Regulation Strategy Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After each vignette, the students were confronted with various strategies, which were derived from proven taxonomies (Engelschalk et al 2015;Schwinger et al 2007;Wolters 1999) and are classified-by means of expert ratings as described by Steuer et al (2016)-as functional (suitable to solve the motivational problem at hand), dysfunctional (not suitable) or ambivalent (neither suitable nor not suitable). Students were asked to rate the suitability of the strategies to overcome the specific motivational problem posed by the vignette at hand on Likert-type scales ranging from 1 (not suitable at all) to 6 (completely suitable).…”
Section: Conditional Motivational Regulation Strategy Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%