Situated Learning: Conceptualization and Measurement

Abstract

A focus on the interaction between cognitive schemas and context in situ has been suggested as fundamental in organizational decision making and information interpretation. Past research suggests that the situation and the social interaction that occur during learning at the cognitive level consist of factors that affect the process, but the research lacks a coherent explanation for how those factors affect it. We propose a conceptualization of learning, termed situated learning, which accounts for these factors. By drawing on situated cognition theory, social learning theory, and the theory of mental models, we identify and measure four components of situated learning, that is, thematic focus, cognitive absorption, social structure, and participation. Among the most important lessons for researchers and practitioners is the need to consider learning as a constellation of the four components instead of an indivisible phenomenon. This perspective can enhance our understanding of cognitive processes, such as information interpretation and decision making.

Race cars and the hellbox: Understanding the development of proficiency among digital art students

“…When this happens, students have a tendency to become mentally engaged with their work to the extent that their mental models change. This is due to cognitive conflicts that occur as a by-product of social interaction (Goel et al 2010). This view is compatible with the de Groot (1972), Chase and Simon (1973) and Goldin (1979) memory, pattern-matching, and knowledge acquisition theories of proficiency development, but brings them together under a unifying principle that incorporates a simulated form of situated learning as a method for developing proficiency.…”

A cross-cultural exploration of situated learning and coping

“…In essence, situated learning has been defined as a change in the mental models which occurs through social interaction in a given context (Goel et al, 2010). A highly decontextualized and simplified learning promotes understanding that is static, rigid and incomplete (Spiro et al, 1991).…”

Teaching Lean Six Sigma within A Supply Chain Context: The Airplane Supply Chain Simulation

“…Immediately following the final simulation run, a questionnaire was administered that measures: (i) perceived learning-students' increased knowledge, increased capabilities, and satisfaction (Arbaugh & Rau, 2007); (ii) participation-the extent to which students engage in social interaction by showing interest in others' ideas, offering suggestions, and attending to other team members during learning exercises (Goel et al, 2010); (iii) organizational identification-a psychological state in which students' goals align with those of the supply chain team such that students feel responsible for the performance of the team (Mael & Ashforth, 1992); and (iv) control variables-section (dichotomous variables), undergraduate business major (dichotomous variable where the value of one indicates business major), months of professional experience, prior lean and six sigma knowledge, and motivation to learn LSS concepts (cf., Cabrera et al, 2001). Immediately following the final simulation run, a questionnaire was administered that measures: (i) perceived learning-students' increased knowledge, increased capabilities, and satisfaction (Arbaugh & Rau, 2007); (ii) participation-the extent to which students engage in social interaction by showing interest in others' ideas, offering suggestions, and attending to other team members during learning exercises (Goel et al, 2010); (iii) organizational identification-a psychological state in which students' goals align with those of the supply chain team such that students feel responsible for the performance of the team (Mael & Ashforth, 1992); and (iv) control variables-section (dichotomous variables), undergraduate business major (dichotomous variable where the value of one indicates business major), months of professional experience, prior lean and six sigma knowledge, and motivation to learn LSS concepts (cf., Cabrera et al, 2001).…”