Situated cognitive engineering for crew support in space

Neerincx, Mark A.

doi:10.1007/s00779-010-0319-3

Cited by 35 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our research utilizes a situated Cognitive Engineering approach (Neerincx, 2010), which is characterized by a preliminary work domain and support analysis (WDS). This analysis draws on both theoretical knowledge, and hands-on experiences to conceptualise requirements for applications.…”

Section: Research Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-oriented support roles of self-management systems

Laverman

Boog

Jansen

et al. 2012

Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motivation -The development of self-management systems has been mainly initiated and driven by health-care professionals, resulting in a primarily medical view on the role of these systems in health care for chronically ill patients. However, lay people consider their health rather in terms of 'participation' and 'feeling healthy'. Therefore, different views regarding the role of self-management systems in health care for chronically ill patients are to be expected.

show abstract

Section: Research Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-oriented support roles of self-management systems

Laverman

Boog

Jansen

et al. 2012

Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the actual shape (i.e., the "look, feel and hearing" in the human-technology communication) of these functions affects their effectiveness substantially. Design specifications and assessments should therefore explicitly address both the functional and communication level [15]. In general, the cognitive engineering methodology should clearly distinguish two levels of specification, the function (or task) and shape (or communication) level, and explicating the design rationale on both levels.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interaction design patterns for coherent and re-usable shape specifications of human-robot collaboration

Mioch¹,

Ledegang²,

Paulissen³

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sharing and re-using design knowledge is a challenge for the diverse multi-disciplinary research and development teams that work on complex and highly automated systems. For this purpose, a situated Cognitive Engineering (sCE) methodology was proposed that specifies and assesses the functional user requirements with their design rationale in a coherent and concise way. This paper presents this approach for the development of human-robot collaboration, focusing on a recently added component: the application of interaction design patterns to capture and share design knowledge on the shape of the human-robot interaction (i.e., the communication level). The sCE case study in the urban search and rescue domain provided the specification and assessment of functions and shape of a team-awareness display. Twenty fire fighters participated as operator of a ground or aerial robot, in several realistic earth quake scenarios to assess the functions and shapes of this display in different settings. It showed that the functions (i.e., the task level requirements and rationale) were valid, while the shape (communication level) was (yet) suboptimal. Based on this evaluation result, a design improvement on the communication level has been proposed without the need to adjust the task-level design solution.

show abstract

“…This also includes training and electronic learning systems. Within the MECA program, the impact on crew operations during long duration missions as well how to improve human machine interaction on these types of missions has been studied extensively 2,3,4 . An important output of the MECA program and its related projects is to establish a common requirements baseline for the cooperative and supportive interaction between man and machine during planetary missions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gamification for Astronaut Training

Cornelissen¹,

Neerincx²,

Smets³

et al. 2012

SpaceOps 2012 Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on the use and the evaluation of applying gaming aspects as a means to promote self-study and increase motivation to train for executing operations on human space flight missions that have a duration that exceeds the typical duration of low earth orbit missions. The gaming aspects that are evaluated include avatar representation, leaderboards, short 'quest' lessons, immediate rewarding, the notion of achievements, the structuring of training content using a skill-graph, and character development. These aspects are implemented in a prototype that integrates training execution, monitoring and evaluation. Subsequently, the prototype is used to evaluate the applicability and efficiency of gaming concepts for training. The evaluation is based on a structured walkthrough, where participants are guided and questioned while using the prototype in a predetermined way. In general, the results indicate that the use of gaming aspects have a positive impact on selfstudy and motivation. In particular the structuring of training content and the character development that is linked to it invites to train more. However, rich training material should be coupled tightly into the gaming aspects in order to achieve these results. This study provides an initial step into applying gaming aspects for astronaut training. More research should be done to further study the applicability of this approach.

show abstract

Situated cognitive engineering for crew support in space

Cited by 35 publications

References 21 publications

Patient-oriented support roles of self-management systems

Patient-oriented support roles of self-management systems

Interaction design patterns for coherent and re-usable shape specifications of human-robot collaboration

Gamification for Astronaut Training

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About