2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site specific prediction of atherosclerotic plaque progression using computational biomechanics and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examinations of knee MRI of osteoarthritis patients [ 144 ] and standardized knee MRI [ 145 ] were a focus of a study of atherosclerosis development within the popliteal artery using ML. AI-based studies which investigated plaque distribution and composition predicted the plaque progression [ 146 , 147 ]. Table 4 presents studies that are included in this analysis.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence and Atherosclerosis In Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examinations of knee MRI of osteoarthritis patients [ 144 ] and standardized knee MRI [ 145 ] were a focus of a study of atherosclerosis development within the popliteal artery using ML. AI-based studies which investigated plaque distribution and composition predicted the plaque progression [ 146 , 147 ]. Table 4 presents studies that are included in this analysis.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence and Atherosclerosis In Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors of this work aimed to present a broader point of view and included studies implementing AI in data analysis. For example, -Machine learning (random forest analysis) Li et al [127] -Human signaling networks, ClusterONE Yang et al [128] Cytoscape, MCODE Machine learning Wang et al [129] DAVID, SPSS Machine learning Tan et al [130] Cytoscape, MCODE Machine learning Zhang et al [131] Cytoscape, MCODE Machine learning Nai et al [132] Cytoscape, R package Machine learning Huang et al [134] Cytoscape Machine learning Yagi et al [135] GeneSpring Machine learning Liu et al [136] Cluster 3.0 genes, Python Machine learning Johno et al [137] -Machine learning Wei and Quan [138] DAVID Machine learning Wang et al [139] Clustering, DAVID, Cytoscape, MCODE Machine learning Wang et al [140] DAVID, R package, Cytoscape, MCODE Machine learning Adela et al [141] -Random forest analysis Canton et al [144] -Deep neural networks Chen et al [145] -Deep neural networks Jurtz et al [146] -Deep learning Kigka et al [147] -Machine learning Wang et al [148] -Machine learning Xu et al [149] -Machine learning Forrest et al [150] -Machine learning Yang et al [151] -Machine learning Sharma et al [152] -Machine learning Chen et al [153] -Machine learning Jones et al [154] -Machine learning Jiang et al [155] -Machine learning Applied Bionics and Biomechanics Depuydt et al [15] presented big data analysis with the R 3.5 environment and Seurat 3.0 [15,33]. "R" is a free software for statistical analysis and graphics and the R method is widely used in new-style AI, involving ML.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They evaluated 25 clinical and 44 CCTA parameters, and ML showed higher AUC than other models (segment stenosis score, segment involvement score, modified Duke Index, Framingham risk score). Han [ 75 ] and Kigka [ 76 ] used ML to predict the rapid development of coronary plaque, which was thought to be associated with cardiovascular events [ 77 , 78 ], revealing the prediction accuracy of 0.81 and 0.84, respectively. Table 1 displays the application of AI in coronary atherosclerotic plaque analysis.…”
Section: Application Of Ai In Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%