2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific approach to growth assessment and cultivation of teak (Tectona grandis) in Nicaraguan dry tropics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plans have been developed for natural forest areas, regional units homogeneous in natural conditions (Plíva and Žlábek, 1986). For the last approximately 30 years, these plans have been conveying a unique conversion of ecological information, provided by the CFEC, to management units facilitating sustainable management, supporting national forestry policy and nature conservation based on fine-scale terrestrial mapping and forest management planning (Kusbach et al, 2023). The management information includes a vegetation dynamic/historic component by existing vegetation "stand types" (characterized by dominant tree species) for the management complex (Kusbach et al, 2017).…”
Section: Ecological Classification As a Forestry Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plans have been developed for natural forest areas, regional units homogeneous in natural conditions (Plíva and Žlábek, 1986). For the last approximately 30 years, these plans have been conveying a unique conversion of ecological information, provided by the CFEC, to management units facilitating sustainable management, supporting national forestry policy and nature conservation based on fine-scale terrestrial mapping and forest management planning (Kusbach et al, 2023). The management information includes a vegetation dynamic/historic component by existing vegetation "stand types" (characterized by dominant tree species) for the management complex (Kusbach et al, 2017).…”
Section: Ecological Classification As a Forestry Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%