2010
DOI: 10.2193/2009-429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Occupancy Dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls in the Eastern Cascades, Washington, USA, 1990–2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(43 reference statements)
6
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum number of surveys at any site in a year was 8, but both the median and mode number of visits across all sites each year was 6, so we truncated all withinyear survey histories at 6 surveys for this analysis to reduce the number of missing observations (Olson et al 2005, Kroll et al 2010). …”
Section: Spotted Owl Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum number of surveys at any site in a year was 8, but both the median and mode number of visits across all sites each year was 6, so we truncated all withinyear survey histories at 6 surveys for this analysis to reduce the number of missing observations (Olson et al 2005, Kroll et al 2010). …”
Section: Spotted Owl Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training included repeated exposure to all calls of each species, then placing the call-broadcast system in wetlands and blindly positioning observers at distances varying from 10-500 m. Training was conducted for each species at wetlands with different vegetative conditions (vegetation density and height) and during various weather conditions. We utilized a two-step modeling process by which covariates on p were modeled first while keeping ψ constant; the top model for p was then included in the models for ψ (Olsen et al 2005, Kroll et al 2010. When modeling ψ, we envisioned a hierarchical model selection framework similar to that described by Johnson (1980) in which birds are first selecting for broad-scale, landscape variables to establish home ranges and then select for microhabitat variables to establish feeding and nesting sites.…”
Section: Occupancy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general field methods for locating and banding of owls, determining sex and age, re-sighting previously marked owls, and determining productivity were described by Franklin et al (1996), and adaptation of this data for occupancy analysis was described by Olson et al (2005). Although these survey methods were designed to document survival and productivity, they also were well suited for determining occupancy rates , Kroll et al 2010.…”
Section: Survey Datamentioning
confidence: 99%