2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1526-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site fidelity of male Galápagos sea lions: a lifetime perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found different abundance patterns among rookeries in the SER, suggesting that the population trend of a single rookery should not be considered representative of the trend in the entire region. Rather, each rookery should be analyzed independently over time, especially considering the high degree of philopatry of GSL to its natal breeding rookeries [37,38]. For instance, at El Malecón, the population increased at an average rate of 2% between 2005 and 2015, while the pup abundance decreased at an average rate of 2% in the same period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we found different abundance patterns among rookeries in the SER, suggesting that the population trend of a single rookery should not be considered representative of the trend in the entire region. Rather, each rookery should be analyzed independently over time, especially considering the high degree of philopatry of GSL to its natal breeding rookeries [37,38]. For instance, at El Malecón, the population increased at an average rate of 2% between 2005 and 2015, while the pup abundance decreased at an average rate of 2% in the same period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in body length within the same season is minimal as adult males have been shown to grow less than 5 cm per year ([29]), thus allowing a comparison of the data for the development of correction factors. We counted the number of pixels matching sea lion body length from nose to tip of tail (Image J, [30]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Meise et al. ) or associated behavior (Kunc and Wolf ). One possibility is that aquatic mating could initially have selected for larger male size to dominate females (Clutton‐Brock and Parker ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when receptive females congregate on land, it is easier for males to station among them than in the water. Aquatic mating makes it more difficult to herd females into a harem, but it does not preclude polygyny (Pörschmann et al 2010;Meise et al 2013) or associated behavior (Kunc and Wolf 2008). One possibility is that aquatic mating could initially have selected for larger male size to dominate females (Clutton-Brock and Parker 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%