2012
DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v126i2.1329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site Fidelity and Annual Survival of the Western Yellow-breasted Chat (<em>Icteria virens auricollis</em>) at the Northern Edge of its Range

Abstract: Other results were as follows: 44% of males and 13% of females banded as adults were re-sighted during the period 2002-2007; 33% of males and 10% of females were re-sighted the year after they were banded; 31% of males and 10% of females had fidelity to the study site where they were banded as adults; 10% of Western Yellow-breasted Chats banded as nestlings returned and, of these, 62% of males and 54% of females returned to their natal study site to breed. The dispersal distance for males banded as adults (n =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the null model) received slightly more support than models indicating that survival varied with gender and/or age, and substantially more support than models indicating that survival varied across years (Table 2 ). The estimated annual apparent survival from the top model was 0.57 ± 0.03, similar to the estimate of 0.65 from a previous study [ 44 ]. See Additional file 1 : Table S1 for estimates of annual survival from the simple temporal model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the null model) received slightly more support than models indicating that survival varied with gender and/or age, and substantially more support than models indicating that survival varied across years (Table 2 ). The estimated annual apparent survival from the top model was 0.57 ± 0.03, similar to the estimate of 0.65 from a previous study [ 44 ]. See Additional file 1 : Table S1 for estimates of annual survival from the simple temporal model.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We colour-banded, monitored, and resighted birds breeding in the Okanagan valley from Penticton (49º 27′ N, 119º 36′ W) to Osoyoos (49º 1′ N, 119º 26′ W) on the USA border, a distance of 66 km between 2001 and 2015. To ensure that resighted individuals were accurately determined, colour combos were confirmed upon multiple observations and by at least two observers (see McKibbin and Bishop [ 23 , 44 ] for details). Birds were sexed and aged (second-year [SY] or after second-year [ASY]) based on plumage characteristics and molt limits [ 24 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of population processes, including survival and site fidelity, is crucial for effective management of woodland bird populations (McKibbin and Bishop 2012, Belder et al 2018). Survival is a key indicator of the extent to which restoration plantings and woodland remnants are providing suitable habitat for woodland birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If survival is low, habitat patches may be acting as population sinks or ecological traps (Dias 1996, Battin 2004). Site fidelity also provides insights into the relative importance of individual habitat patches for animal populations (McKibbin and Bishop 2012, Meager et al 2018). If site fidelity is high, managers might allocate resources to maintain or improve habitat quality in targeted areas (Lehnen and Rodewald 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Bernard et al. , but see McKibbin and Bishop ). Greater site fidelity is presumably favored for males because territory possession, which is enhanced by reuse of known breeding sites (e.g., Krebs , Jakobsson , Cooper et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%