2018
DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual survival and breeding dispersal of a migratory passerine, the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher

Abstract: Knowledge of survival rates is critical for advancing our understanding of the dynamics of populations and here we report apparent annual survival and breeding dispersal of Scissor-tailed Flycatchers (Tyrannus forficatus) breeding at two sites in southwest Oklahoma (Ft. Sill and Wichita Mountain Wildlife Refuge [WMWR]). Our Cormack-Jolly-Seber estimate of apparent adult survival for the period from 2008 to 2105 was relatively low (0.514) compared to estimates for 36 other migratory and socially monogamous pass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be particularly problematic when comparing survival of immigrants and philopatric individuals because delayed natal philopatry can bias the survival of immigrants whose natal sites are not monitored. More generally, this also implies that survival estimates can be biased in populations that receive immigrants (Chernetsov et al 2009, Becker et al 2018), and that survival estimated from individuals born within the study area should be less prone to biases due to permanent emigration (Pakanen et al 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be particularly problematic when comparing survival of immigrants and philopatric individuals because delayed natal philopatry can bias the survival of immigrants whose natal sites are not monitored. More generally, this also implies that survival estimates can be biased in populations that receive immigrants (Chernetsov et al 2009, Becker et al 2018), and that survival estimated from individuals born within the study area should be less prone to biases due to permanent emigration (Pakanen et al 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These alleles could either be beneficial, making individuals better adapted to new environments and enabling further expansion (Arnold 1997, Barton 2001, Grant et al 2004, or detrimental, leading to reduced fitness of individuals at the periphery and a contraction of recent expansion (Rhymer & Simberloff 1996, Arnold 1997, Muhlfeld et al 2009). Beyond local effects, introgression has the potential to be widespread in these species because of low natal and breeding philopatry in both species (Gamble & Bergin 2012, Regosin 2013, Becker et al 2018. Ephemeral hybridization events could lead to the spread of introgressed alleles as hybrids disperse into other portions of the species' ranges to breed in subsequent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, true survival and site fidelity in mobile species are often combined into a single metric, apparent survival (Sandercock 2006). While apparent survival is assumed to be equivalent to (or at least, a good surrogate for) true survival by many authors, growing evidence suggests that in grassland birds, apparent survival estimates may largely be shaped by dispersal (Gilroy et al 2012, Schaub and Royle 2014, Taylor et al 2015, Becker et al 2018). Thus, adopting modeling approaches that attempt to distinguish survival from emigration are required to elucidate the environmental factors that shape life‐history traits and behaviors within and among species.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%