2021
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.8.5.052103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinogram + image domain neural network approach for metal artifact reduction in low-dose cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract: Purpose: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used in the operating room to evaluate the placement of surgical implants in relation to critical anatomical structures. A particularly problematic setting, however, is the imaging of metallic implants, where strong artifacts can obscure visualization of both the implant and surrounding anatomy. Such artifacts are compounded when combined with low-dose imaging techniques such as sparse-view acquisition.Approach: This work presents a dual convolutional n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is possible because a self‐supervised target function can be formulated directly on the reconstructed volume while still driving parameter updates in the raw data domain. The cupping correction is a simple yet effective application of the proposed reconstruction pipeline which also hints at its potential in tasks requiring deeper models like complex artefact suppression 14,15 or image denoising 16,17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is possible because a self‐supervised target function can be formulated directly on the reconstructed volume while still driving parameter updates in the raw data domain. The cupping correction is a simple yet effective application of the proposed reconstruction pipeline which also hints at its potential in tasks requiring deeper models like complex artefact suppression 14,15 or image denoising 16,17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, due to the dependency of the kernel on two voxels of the input volume X k and X i , the analytical derivative of the convolutional kernel is more elaborate. When calculating the sum in (13), both (15) and ( 16) are used for the contributions k = i and only the term k = i is derived in (17) and (18). Note that for faster computation the sums in ( 17) and ( 18) can be pre-calculated in the forward pass of the filtering.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas such approaches usually require hand-tuned hyperparameters, cannot abstract complex features, or are known to be computationally expensive, purely data-driven, end-to-end trainable, approaches have been proposed in recent years 11,12,13,14,15,16,17 fueled by the emergence of deep learning and, in particular, convolutional neural networks. Most of these models achieve competitive denoising performance but are built on deep neural networks with multiple layers and contain hundreds of thousands of trainable parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle this problem, several MAR methods have been proposed recently for sparse-view sampling schemes. [32][33][34] However, the TV-IR-based method 34 does not utilize any DL-based prior, and this shows limited performance in improving reconstructed image Compared to the above methods, our method provides state-of -the-art image quality without potential risk of the errors in sinogram-domain CNN processing. In the proposed framework, two CNNs used together with NMAR processing to facilitate artifact reduction in metal-inserted sparse-view CT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%