2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4149(99)00102-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singular stochastic control in the presence of a state-dependent yield structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical analysis of such control problems has evolved considerably from the initial heuristics to the more sophisticated and standard stochastic control approach, and from the very special case study to general payoff functions. (See Harrison and Taksar (1983); Karatzas (1985); Karatzas and Shreve (1985); El Karoui and Karatzas ( , 1989; Ma (1992); Zervos (1994, 1998); Boetius and Kohlmann (1998); Alvarez (2000Alvarez ( , 2001; Bank (2005); Boetius (2005)). Most recently, Merhi and Zervos (2007) analyzed this problem in great generality and provided explicit solutions for the special case where the payoff is of Cobb-Douglas type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical analysis of such control problems has evolved considerably from the initial heuristics to the more sophisticated and standard stochastic control approach, and from the very special case study to general payoff functions. (See Harrison and Taksar (1983); Karatzas (1985); Karatzas and Shreve (1985); El Karoui and Karatzas ( , 1989; Ma (1992); Zervos (1994, 1998); Boetius and Kohlmann (1998); Alvarez (2000Alvarez ( , 2001; Bank (2005); Boetius (2005)). Most recently, Merhi and Zervos (2007) analyzed this problem in great generality and provided explicit solutions for the special case where the payoff is of Cobb-Douglas type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This heuristic argument -also discussed at pp. 329-330 of [2] in the context of one-dimensional monotone follower problems -can be rigorously justified, and technical details on the convergence can be found in the recent [5]. We also refer to [17] and [29] as other papers on singular stochastic control problems employing such a definition for the integral with respect to the control process.…”
Section: Setting and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 2. To prove the monotonicity of V with respect to σ we adapt to our setting ideas from Theorem 4 in [2]. Let V be the value function when the volatility coefficient in (2.2) iŝ σ.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis In the Case Of A Drifted Brownian Motiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) As discussed in the introduction, problems of optimal harvesting or of optimal dividends' distribution with (compulsory) capital injections might be modeled as (2.21). More in detail, problem (2.21) might be interpreted as an optimal harvesting problem (see, e.g., [3] and [4]), in which the harvester has the obligation of preserving a population that can extinguish in finite time. In this case, X D is the (logarithm of the) size of the population, D t is the cumulative amount of members of the population that have been harvested up to time t ≥ 0, and L D t the cumulative amount of members of the species that have been reintroduced up to time t ≥ 0 in order to avoid extinction.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two problems from applications leading to (1.1) are those of optimal dividends' distribution with capital injections (see, e.g., [27], [30], and [46]), and of optimal harvesting (see, e.g., [3], [4], and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%