2008
DOI: 10.1308/135576108785891015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth

Abstract: Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding supports the evidence that single‐visit root canal treatment is an effective pain management strategy for teeth with irreversible pulpitis . A Cochrane systematic review report of single‐visit root canal treatment being associated with higher incidence of post‐treatment pain when compared with multiple‐visit treatment is contrary to the present finding . The reason for this varied observation is likely to be a result of the lower pre‐operative pain intensity for the patients included in the current study, which attributed to reduced post‐operative pain incidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This finding supports the evidence that single‐visit root canal treatment is an effective pain management strategy for teeth with irreversible pulpitis . A Cochrane systematic review report of single‐visit root canal treatment being associated with higher incidence of post‐treatment pain when compared with multiple‐visit treatment is contrary to the present finding . The reason for this varied observation is likely to be a result of the lower pre‐operative pain intensity for the patients included in the current study, which attributed to reduced post‐operative pain incidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Measuring pain as an outcome is difficult; therefore, the questionnaire asked for a simple verbal categorization, as recommended in a recent Cochrane Review (Figini et al . ) of the intensity (mild, moderate and intense), which was defined by the need for and relief from an analgesic. In addition, using questionnaires answered and returned by patients has the inherent risk of bias because patients who experience more severe outcomes (especially higher levels of pain) will be more prone to answering them (Ferreira‐Valente et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and reviewed (Figini et al . ). However, the majority of these studies analysed the association between individual factors related to patient (age, gender and medical evaluation) or to the affected tooth (type, pulp status, preoperative pain, periapical radiolucencies, previous emergency treatment, presence of occlusal contacts) and post‐endodontic pain primarily through chi‐square tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Figini et al . ) and, as an alternative, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate gel (CHX) has emerged (Barbosa et al . , Manzur et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%