Single- versus dual-console robotic surgery: dual improves the educational experience for trainees

Goonewardene, Sanchia S.; Brown, Matthew; Challacombe, Benjamin

doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1762-1

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The benefits of the dual console in proctoring young surgeons in colorectal, gynaecology, and urology are reported in the literature [2][3][4][5]. Goonewardene et al [6] reported that the dual-console training "allows for unique trainee-trainer dynamics that are simply not possible with single-console robotics or even open surgery" therefore enforcing the role of this training approach.…”

Section: E D I T O R I a L Dual Console Operating In Robotic Surgery ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dual console operating in robotic surgery – a show off or a real necessity?

Piozzi

Khan

2023

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: E D I T O R I a L Dual Console Operating In Robotic Surgery ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dual console operating in robotic surgery – a show off or a real necessity?

Piozzi

Khan

2023

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Besides robotic surgery, which offers these functionalities within the dual console [7], tele-companion technology uses portable tools such as Google Glass to put the learner and the mentor in contact [8]. The development of these less expensive techniques allows their access to developing countries [9].…”

Section: Iib) Diffusion Of the Surgical Gesturementioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical apprenticeship in the era of simulation

Berte

Perrenot

2020

Journal of Visceral Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Учбовий процес та крива навчання, що пов'язані з ЛПН, є дещо довшими порівняно з ВПН [26,27]. Цей процес може бути у подальшому прискорений шляхом впровадження сучасних навчальних програм та більш активного використання тренажерів [28,29].…”

Section: а к т у а л ь н ы е т е м ыunclassified

Our Experience of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Technique and Results

Головко

Балабаник

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is considered an effective modern minimally invasive surgical intervention and is an alternative to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in the surgical treatment of kidney cancer.The objective: to provide modern evidence of the effectiveness of LPN in the surgical treatment of patients and to describe the further evolution of this minimally invasive technique.Materials and methods. We prospectively analyzed the data of 63 patients who underwent LPN for clinically localized kidney cancer since September 2015 to October2019 in the urology clinic of theNationalMilitaryClinicalHospital «GVKG» of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. LPN was performed using anOlympus endoscopic stand. Clinical data were obtained through a prospective analysis of surgical interventions, including intra- and postoperative results and complications. Descriptive statistical analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model were used to predict surgical outcomes.Results. The average age of the patients was 60.7 years; the average preoperative tumor size was33.0 mm. According to the PADUA-scale, 22 (35.0 %) patients were categorized as low difficulty, 23 (36.5 %) to the intermediate difficulty category and 18 (28.5 %) to the high difficulty category. All patients had transperitoneal access. The average surgery time was 156 minutes. The average blood loss was 171 ml. Overall, significant postoperative complications occurred in 2 (3.2 %) patients (Clavien-Dindo >2). We did not find any statistically significant differences between pre- and postoperative level of creatinine (p<0.05). In general, optimal surgical results, including analysis of the surgical margin, degree of ischemia, and level of complications, were achieved in 44 (69.8 %) patients. During an average of 26 months of observation, only two local and two distant metastases were recorded. In the end, using the multivariate logistic regression model, it was revealed that the degree of complexity of the tumor was associated with a greater risk of obtaining a non-optimal surgical result.Conclusions. LPN is an effective minimally invasive alternative to OPN in the treatment of clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. We presented the current experience of the use of LPN in the surgical treatment of kidney cancer. LPN, as it turned out, is an effective and safe minimally invasive operation that provides optimal results in most patients with varying degrees of tumor complexity.

show abstract

Single- versus dual-console robotic surgery: dual improves the educational experience for trainees

Cited by 13 publications

References 15 publications

Dual console operating in robotic surgery – a show off or a real necessity?

Dual console operating in robotic surgery – a show off or a real necessity?

Surgical apprenticeship in the era of simulation

Our Experience of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Technique and Results

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About