2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single step amperometric growth of CZTS thin film: Deposition current and stoichiometry relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compositionally, the films have a Cu/Zn/Sn ratio of 1.73/1.10/1.00 with a Cu/(Zn+Sn) ratio of 0.83 ± 0.02, a Cu/Sn ratio of 1.73 ± 0.03, and a Zn/Sn ratio of 1.10 ± 0.01, as measured by EDX. This is consistent with the sought-for high-Zn content CZTS and increases the likelihood of Cu vacancies. These ratios also have the effect of reducing the chances of localized defect-clusters and disorder. , The Cu–Sn does not show any deviation, a phenomenon that is discussed further along with the Sn EXAFS; however, when combined with the extended bond lengths of the third shellS(2) and S(3) in the Supporting Informationsulfurs, it appears that the Sn forms a fairly unchanging sublattice and does not participate much in antisite or vacancy formation within the films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Compositionally, the films have a Cu/Zn/Sn ratio of 1.73/1.10/1.00 with a Cu/(Zn+Sn) ratio of 0.83 ± 0.02, a Cu/Sn ratio of 1.73 ± 0.03, and a Zn/Sn ratio of 1.10 ± 0.01, as measured by EDX. This is consistent with the sought-for high-Zn content CZTS and increases the likelihood of Cu vacancies. These ratios also have the effect of reducing the chances of localized defect-clusters and disorder. , The Cu–Sn does not show any deviation, a phenomenon that is discussed further along with the Sn EXAFS; however, when combined with the extended bond lengths of the third shellS(2) and S(3) in the Supporting Informationsulfurs, it appears that the Sn forms a fairly unchanging sublattice and does not participate much in antisite or vacancy formation within the films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…So far, several deposition methods for CZTS thin films have been investigated, which include RF and direct-current (DC) magnetron sputtering deposition [24,25], co-evaporation [26], electron beam evaporation [27], pulsed laser deposition [28], spray pyrolysis deposition [29], spin coating [30], screen-printing [31], and electrodeposition [32]. The electrodeposition technique as a solution-based process is a suitable and affordable synthesis method with low-cost precursors, high-rate deposition, and low-temperature deposition conditions [33]. However, this deposition method would face some limitations in large-scale production in the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%