2018
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single‐institution report of setup margins of voluntary deep‐inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) whole breast radiotherapy implemented with real‐time surface imaging

Abstract: PurposeWe calculated setup margins for whole breast radiotherapy during voluntary deep‐inspiration breath‐hold (vDIBH) using real‐time surface imaging (SI).Methods and MaterialsPatients (n = 58) with a 27‐to‐31 split between right‐ and left‐sided cancers were analyzed. Treatment beams were gated using AlignRT by registering the whole breast region‐of‐interest to the surface generated from the simulation CT scan. AlignRT recorded (three‐dimensional) 3D displacements and the beam‐on‐state every 0.3 s. Means and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kügele et al reported that the intrafractional reproducibility for tangential and locoregional treatment was as low as 1 mm (median over 40 patients) in all three translational directions, but during a single treatment session the maximum deviation was up to 5 mm, which resulted in large effects on the target coverage and OAR doses [ 70 ]. The accuracy of SGRT systems have been reported within 5 mm for DIBH positioning and monitoring [ 71 ], and are similar to those reported in studies using spirometry-based positioning [ 68 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kügele et al reported that the intrafractional reproducibility for tangential and locoregional treatment was as low as 1 mm (median over 40 patients) in all three translational directions, but during a single treatment session the maximum deviation was up to 5 mm, which resulted in large effects on the target coverage and OAR doses [ 70 ]. The accuracy of SGRT systems have been reported within 5 mm for DIBH positioning and monitoring [ 71 ], and are similar to those reported in studies using spirometry-based positioning [ 68 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…SGRT systems offer the possibility of evaluating intra-DIBH stability, which has been reported with ≤0.7 mm, together with an intra-fractional reproducibility of ≤2.2 mm [68] and with 0.3 mm as the median standard deviation of the BH level during DIBH [69]. Kügele et al reported that the intrafractional reproducibility for tangential and locoregional treatment was as low as 1 mm (median over 40 patients) in all three translational directions, but during a single treatment session the maximum deviation was up to 5 mm, which resulted in large effects on the target coverage and OAR doses [70].…”
Section: Breath-holdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the intra-fraction BH position variability is on average 2.4 mm (range 2.2–2.8 mm). This result is in agreement with previous studies, where the average variability was within 0.5 mm [33], 2.2 mm [34], 1 mm [6] and 3.4 mm [35] (calculation of the variability was consistent with this study) and 4 mm (variability determined as the average standard deviation over BH positions) [36]. Other studies have also shown low variability in BH positions with the ABC system [37, 38] and other spirometer based systems [39, 40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The same authors found a DIBH-stability of < 0.7 mm and a reproducibility of < 2.2 mm, which is similar to the present results. They analyzed the median of the 5th-95th percentile range of the translational displacement during a single breathhold or during all breath-holds throughout a single treatment session [26]. Unfortunately, only the vertical amplitude could be evaluated with the Catalyst™ system, which is a limitation of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%