2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single dilution Avidity-Blocking ELISA as an alternative to the Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus neutralization test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro neutralizing activity usually correlates with avidity (Bachmann et al 1997) which can be easily measured by ELISA. Correlation between avidity and VNT has been reported for vesicular stomatitis virus (Bachmann et al 1997), measles virus (Saika et al 2008), tick-borne encephalitis (Leonova & Pavlenko 2009) and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (Franco Mahecha et al 2011). We have also shown that the avidity indexes of anti-FMDV bovine antibodies are concordant with the VNT results (Lavoria et al 2012;).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vitro neutralizing activity usually correlates with avidity (Bachmann et al 1997) which can be easily measured by ELISA. Correlation between avidity and VNT has been reported for vesicular stomatitis virus (Bachmann et al 1997), measles virus (Saika et al 2008), tick-borne encephalitis (Leonova & Pavlenko 2009) and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (Franco Mahecha et al 2011). We have also shown that the avidity indexes of anti-FMDV bovine antibodies are concordant with the VNT results (Lavoria et al 2012;).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These assays avoid the need of developing coating and detector antibodies for each particular strain and allow high-throughput assessment as they are performed with a single dilution of the sera, for detecting both total (IE) and high-avidity antibodies (AE). AEs are usually used to discriminate between chronic and acute infections, or as an alternative to neutralization assays, among other applications (Thomas & Morgan-Capner 1988;Enders & Knotek 1989;Schubert et al 1998;Fox et al 2006;Hamkar et al 2006;Franco Mahecha et al 2011). This strategy has been applied before to detach low binders and increase the specificity of the ELISA applied for FMDV diagnosis in cross-protection trials .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,12] But it was lower than an avidity blocking ELISA using drosophila expressed E2 antigen that showed a sensitivity of 98.10%. [32] This may be explained by the reason that most ELISAs probably detect preferentially IgG isotypes, while VNT detects both IgM and IgG isotypes. [33] A slightly lower specificity of the developed E2 ELISA was observed in our study when compared to the VNT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The avidity of those antibodies was determined by incubating plates with 100 μL per well of 6 mol/L urea–PBS for 20 minutes after the first washing step . The ELISA then followed the protocol previously described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%