Abstract:Buffaloes are compulsory vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in many countries as part of the official control programmes. Serological testing aimed to indirectly assess herd immunity is currently performed using the same Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) applied for bovine sera, assuming an agreement between the ELISA's diagnostic results and those obtained using the virus neutralization test (VNT). Here we evaluated the accuracy of different ELISA tests to assess vaccine-induced … Show more
“…Results were analyzed by multivariate two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni correction to compare between different time points. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated using ROC curves for the best-fit values for each individual assay as described before (18). Tables were built to identify the frequency of true positive and negative results, as well as false positive and negative results according to the VNT titers used as reference assay ("gold standard").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the difficulties inherent to the VNT, such as the need for cultured cells, live FMDV and dedicated facilities prevent this low-throughput assay from being suitable for the field assessment of vaccine-induced antibodies, being ELISAs preferred for this purpose. We have demonstrated before that the currently used liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) yielded very low specificity with buffalos' serum samples, probably due to the presence of high levels of "sticky" natural antibodies that over-estimate antigen-specific antibody levels, among other issues related to the assay itself (18). Alternatively, aiming to improve the specificity of the antibody assessment, we developed an indirect ELISA (IE) using purified 140S viral particles, which proved to detect IgG mainly directed against capsid-exposed epitopes (15); and an avidity singledilution ELISA (AE) based on the same indirect design (15), which includes an additional urea washing step to detach weak binders (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have demonstrated before that the currently used liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) yielded very low specificity with buffalos' serum samples, probably due to the presence of high levels of "sticky" natural antibodies that over-estimate antigen-specific antibody levels, among other issues related to the assay itself (18). Alternatively, aiming to improve the specificity of the antibody assessment, we developed an indirect ELISA (IE) using purified 140S viral particles, which proved to detect IgG mainly directed against capsid-exposed epitopes (15); and an avidity singledilution ELISA (AE) based on the same indirect design (15), which includes an additional urea washing step to detach weak binders (18,19). The improved performance of avidity ELISA compared to LPBE was demonstrated by our group (18) and further verified in a recent study using field serum samples from 40 multi-vaccinated buffalos (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, aiming to improve the specificity of the antibody assessment, we developed an indirect ELISA (IE) using purified 140S viral particles, which proved to detect IgG mainly directed against capsid-exposed epitopes (15); and an avidity singledilution ELISA (AE) based on the same indirect design (15), which includes an additional urea washing step to detach weak binders (18,19). The improved performance of avidity ELISA compared to LPBE was demonstrated by our group (18) and further verified in a recent study using field serum samples from 40 multi-vaccinated buffalos (20).…”
The role of water buffaloes in foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemiology as one of the major hosts of the virus that can develop persistent asymptomatic infection highlights the importance of sustaining surveillance on the antibody response elicited by vaccination in these animals. There is gap in the knowledge on how serological assays that measure antibodies against capsid proteins perform with buffalo samples and which would be the most reliable test to substitute the virus neutralization test (VNT) a cumbersome and low-throughput tool for field surveillance. Alternatively, the liquid-phase blocking sandwich ELISA (LPBE) is commonly used. Previous data from our laboratory demonstrated that the vaccine-induced antibodies assessed by the LPBE yielded low specificity with buffaloes’ samples. In contrast, a single-dilution avidity ELISA (AE) aimed to detect high-avidity antibodies against exposed epitopes, combined with an indirect ELISA (IE) to assess IgG levels, produced more reliable results. Here we analyzed for the first time the kinetics of the antibodies induced by vaccination in two different buffalo herds (n = 91) over 120 days using AE, IE, LPBE, and the VNT. Kinetics were similar in the different assays, with an increase of antibodies between 0- and 14-days post-vaccination (dpv) which were maintained thereafter. VNT and AE results were concordant (Kappa value = 0.76), and both assays revealed a decay in the antibody response in calves with maternal antibodies at 90 and 120 dpv, which was not evidenced by the LPBE. These results show that kinetics of antibody responses to FMD vaccination are similar in buffalo and cattle, and support the use of indirect ELISA assays, in particular Avidity ELISA, as alternatives to the VNT for vaccine-immunity monitoring irrespectively of the animal’s passive or active immune status.
“…Results were analyzed by multivariate two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni correction to compare between different time points. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated using ROC curves for the best-fit values for each individual assay as described before (18). Tables were built to identify the frequency of true positive and negative results, as well as false positive and negative results according to the VNT titers used as reference assay ("gold standard").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the difficulties inherent to the VNT, such as the need for cultured cells, live FMDV and dedicated facilities prevent this low-throughput assay from being suitable for the field assessment of vaccine-induced antibodies, being ELISAs preferred for this purpose. We have demonstrated before that the currently used liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) yielded very low specificity with buffalos' serum samples, probably due to the presence of high levels of "sticky" natural antibodies that over-estimate antigen-specific antibody levels, among other issues related to the assay itself (18). Alternatively, aiming to improve the specificity of the antibody assessment, we developed an indirect ELISA (IE) using purified 140S viral particles, which proved to detect IgG mainly directed against capsid-exposed epitopes (15); and an avidity singledilution ELISA (AE) based on the same indirect design (15), which includes an additional urea washing step to detach weak binders (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have demonstrated before that the currently used liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) yielded very low specificity with buffalos' serum samples, probably due to the presence of high levels of "sticky" natural antibodies that over-estimate antigen-specific antibody levels, among other issues related to the assay itself (18). Alternatively, aiming to improve the specificity of the antibody assessment, we developed an indirect ELISA (IE) using purified 140S viral particles, which proved to detect IgG mainly directed against capsid-exposed epitopes (15); and an avidity singledilution ELISA (AE) based on the same indirect design (15), which includes an additional urea washing step to detach weak binders (18,19). The improved performance of avidity ELISA compared to LPBE was demonstrated by our group (18) and further verified in a recent study using field serum samples from 40 multi-vaccinated buffalos (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, aiming to improve the specificity of the antibody assessment, we developed an indirect ELISA (IE) using purified 140S viral particles, which proved to detect IgG mainly directed against capsid-exposed epitopes (15); and an avidity singledilution ELISA (AE) based on the same indirect design (15), which includes an additional urea washing step to detach weak binders (18,19). The improved performance of avidity ELISA compared to LPBE was demonstrated by our group (18) and further verified in a recent study using field serum samples from 40 multi-vaccinated buffalos (20).…”
The role of water buffaloes in foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemiology as one of the major hosts of the virus that can develop persistent asymptomatic infection highlights the importance of sustaining surveillance on the antibody response elicited by vaccination in these animals. There is gap in the knowledge on how serological assays that measure antibodies against capsid proteins perform with buffalo samples and which would be the most reliable test to substitute the virus neutralization test (VNT) a cumbersome and low-throughput tool for field surveillance. Alternatively, the liquid-phase blocking sandwich ELISA (LPBE) is commonly used. Previous data from our laboratory demonstrated that the vaccine-induced antibodies assessed by the LPBE yielded low specificity with buffaloes’ samples. In contrast, a single-dilution avidity ELISA (AE) aimed to detect high-avidity antibodies against exposed epitopes, combined with an indirect ELISA (IE) to assess IgG levels, produced more reliable results. Here we analyzed for the first time the kinetics of the antibodies induced by vaccination in two different buffalo herds (n = 91) over 120 days using AE, IE, LPBE, and the VNT. Kinetics were similar in the different assays, with an increase of antibodies between 0- and 14-days post-vaccination (dpv) which were maintained thereafter. VNT and AE results were concordant (Kappa value = 0.76), and both assays revealed a decay in the antibody response in calves with maternal antibodies at 90 and 120 dpv, which was not evidenced by the LPBE. These results show that kinetics of antibody responses to FMD vaccination are similar in buffalo and cattle, and support the use of indirect ELISA assays, in particular Avidity ELISA, as alternatives to the VNT for vaccine-immunity monitoring irrespectively of the animal’s passive or active immune status.
“…It is necessary to produce Abs (polyclonal and/or monoclonal) for FMDV SP ELISA tests against each of newly emerged, genotypically crucial, exotic strains of FMDV just like the effort of a new primer-probe design for the molecular differentiation of novel FMDV with PCR. However, the period for the production of polyclonal Abs for FMDV serology takes a long time and laborious work (Parida 2009;Lavoria et al 2012;Sala et al 2018;Salem et al 2019).…”
Antibodies (Abs) have been one of the most important tools in diagnostic laboratories. Many diagnostic techniques such as Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assays (ELISA), immunofluorescence, Ab-microarray platforms, immunoblots, X-ray crystallography require the Abs. ELISA is an assay method that is among the basic tests using antibodies for the serology of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMDV). This method requires polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies to detect FMDV antigen or antibodies. For this purpose, solid-phase competitive ELISA (SPCE) or liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) and non-structural protein (NSP) ELISA are used. SPCE and LPBE have mainly used FMDV structural protein antibody (SP-Ab) detection.In this study, it was aimed to produce a polyclonal Ab against FMDV ANep84 (Genotype VII) and OTUR07 (OPanAsia II), ATUR11 (A Iran05) strains for LPBE, FMDV SP-Ab detection. For this purpose, four guinea pigs and six rabbits were used for each serotype of FMDV. After producing Abs, checkerboard ELISA titration was performed to determine the optimal test dilution of Abs. Backgrounds, cross-reactions against three strains of FMDV were also checked. In conclusion, polyclonal Abs were produced against FMDV ANep84 (Genotype VII) and O Tur07 (O Pan Asia II), ATUR11 (A Iran05) strains, and standardized for LPBE test.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.