1995
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/33.12.686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Capillary Isotachophoresis--Zone Electrophoresis: Current Practice and Prospects, A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytes dissolved in Ringer's solution cannot be detected with normal CE due to sample destacking, and therefore were dissolved in BGE for comparison. Theoretical peak widths based on longitudinal diffusion only were calculated using equation 1 (1) where W ½ ,diff is the width at half the peak height, D is the diffusion coefficient for small molecules, and t m is the migration time (s) in normal CE. Peak width calculations were made using a diffusion coefficient range of 1 × 10 −6 to 5 × 10 −5 cm 2 ·s −1 , typical for small organic molecules [ 21 ].…”
Section: Enhanced Ph-mediated Stacking With a Dynamic Ph Junction Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analytes dissolved in Ringer's solution cannot be detected with normal CE due to sample destacking, and therefore were dissolved in BGE for comparison. Theoretical peak widths based on longitudinal diffusion only were calculated using equation 1 (1) where W ½ ,diff is the width at half the peak height, D is the diffusion coefficient for small molecules, and t m is the migration time (s) in normal CE. Peak width calculations were made using a diffusion coefficient range of 1 × 10 −6 to 5 × 10 −5 cm 2 ·s −1 , typical for small organic molecules [ 21 ].…”
Section: Enhanced Ph-mediated Stacking With a Dynamic Ph Junction Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be especially detrimental when using photometric detection since the small capillary dimensions already place a limitation on concentration sensitivity. Improving sensitivity for optical detection methods has been the focus of many investigations [1][2][3][4]. The most common method to reverse this effect is to perform a dilution or extraction of the sample into a low-ionic strength matrix in order to increase the field strength in the sample zone relative to the background electrolyte (BGE), and is generally referred to as fieldamplified sample stacking [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In this method, the capillary is Ðrst Ðlled with a high-mobility background electrolyte, followed by the sample with lower mobility and Ðnally a terminating electrolyte with mobility lower than that of the sample. As a result of the discontinuous bu †er system, the Ðeld strength varies along the capillary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be especially detrimental when using UV detection since the small capillary dimensions already place a limitation on concentration sensitivity. There have been several strategies developed to improve the concentration sensitivity of CE on-line, including field-amplified sample stacking [7][8][9][10][11], large-volume sample stacking [12,13], isotachophoresis [14,15], stacking of neutral analytes [16,17], dynamic pH junction [18,19], the transient moving chemical reaction boundary method (tMCRBM) [20,21], and chromatographic preconcentration [22]. Field-amplified stacking is the simplest of these techniques and has therefore been the most commonly used approach for on-column pre-concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%