2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01220-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single application of topical doxycycline in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence

Abstract: Background: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a highly prevalent oral mucosal disease. The management of RAS is quite challenging, and as yet, there is no definitive cure. The present systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of a single application of topical doxycycline for the management of RAS. Methods: A comprehensive online search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify all relevant studies published up to March 31, 2019. All randomized clini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Hormonal factors, hematologic diseases, genetic predisposition, and immunologic disorders (autoimmunity, immunodeficiency), as well as local trauma, viral or bacterial infections, vitamin deficiencies, emotional stress, and chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), have been identified as local and systemic risk factors. 1,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10] RAS-induced severe pain, discomfort, and difficulties with eating and speaking can reduce the quality of life, particularly in patients who have recurrent attacks regularly. 3,4 Since the etiology of RAS is still undetermined, there is currently no specific therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Hormonal factors, hematologic diseases, genetic predisposition, and immunologic disorders (autoimmunity, immunodeficiency), as well as local trauma, viral or bacterial infections, vitamin deficiencies, emotional stress, and chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), have been identified as local and systemic risk factors. 1,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10] RAS-induced severe pain, discomfort, and difficulties with eating and speaking can reduce the quality of life, particularly in patients who have recurrent attacks regularly. 3,4 Since the etiology of RAS is still undetermined, there is currently no specific therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no specific therapy for RAS; the main aim of RAS management is basically to control the symptoms (pain and discomfort) and reduce the healing time 5,6 . Various topical preparations have been used for the management of RAS; these include corticosteroids, antibiotics (such as tetracycline mouth rinse and doxycycline gel), local anesthetics (such as lidocaine), herbal agents (such as aloe vera and curcumin), and hyaluronic acid, among others 5–9 . Of these, topical corticosteroids have been the most widely used medication for the management of RAS 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, researchers have been in search for alternative therapeutics for RAS. A number of systematic reviews and/or meta‐analyses have compared the efficacy of different topical medications used for RAS and reported variable results 9,14–16 . However, these meta‐analyses (like any other conventional meta‐analysis) could only summarize the effect size of two interventions but cannot compare the efficacy of more than two types of interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the quality of daily life is severely affected by localized mucosal defects resulting in poor palatability, pain due to chemical-mechanical irritation and recurrent episodes [31]. To date, several authors have conducted traditional meta-analyses of local interventions for RAS [32][33][34]. Their focus has been on whether the interventions studied have a positive effect compared to an ineffective placebo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%