2018
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2018.2811415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Recognition and Assessment of Post-Stroke Hemiparetic Gait by Fusing Kinematic, Kinetic, and Electrophysiological Data

Abstract: Gait analysis for the patients with lower limb motor dysfunction is a useful tool in assisting clinicians for diagnosis, assessment, and rehabilitation strategy making. Implementing accurate automatic gait analysis for the hemiparetic patients after stroke is a great challenge in clinical practice. This study is to develop a new automatic gait analysis system for qualitatively recognizing and quantitatively assessing the gait abnormality of the post-stroke hemiparetic patients. Twenty-one post-stroke patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gait disorders are usually associated with an ageing population as well as stroke survivors with hemiplegia, thus leading to both a reduced quality of life and an increased mortality rate. The detection of gait events or gait characteristics is essential to numerous applications including the development of control mechanisms in drop foot correction devices [1,2,3,4,5], human activity recognition for healthcare [6,7], motor recovery assessments for effective rehabilitation strategies [1,8], especially for patients with lower limb motor dysfunction following a severe stroke. Heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO) are regarded as two core gait events in a normal gait cycle, which provide information on the swing, stance, and stride gait parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gait disorders are usually associated with an ageing population as well as stroke survivors with hemiplegia, thus leading to both a reduced quality of life and an increased mortality rate. The detection of gait events or gait characteristics is essential to numerous applications including the development of control mechanisms in drop foot correction devices [1,2,3,4,5], human activity recognition for healthcare [6,7], motor recovery assessments for effective rehabilitation strategies [1,8], especially for patients with lower limb motor dysfunction following a severe stroke. Heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO) are regarded as two core gait events in a normal gait cycle, which provide information on the swing, stance, and stride gait parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is difficult for developers and clinicians to truly understand the mechanism of gait event detection that often hinders proper interpretation for practical applications [9,13,14]. By exploiting the limitations of the above described threshold-based approaches and machine learning based methods [1,8], continuous wavelet transform (CWT) based methods have been considered as an alternative solution. By simultaneously providing a signal’s information in the time and frequency domains through a series of decomposition and reconstruction operation, the wavelet transform method has been utilized as an effective tool in various fields, such as signal de-noising [15], speech/signal processing and evaluation [16,17,18], and health threatening illness diagnosis [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait disorders are usually associated with the ageing population as well as falling, leading to both a reduced quality of life and an increased mortality rate. The detection of gait events is an important tool in clinics [1,2], including human activity recognition for healthcare [3,4] and motor recovery assessments for effective rehabilitation strategies [5,6]. Hence, it is essential to develop an effective algorithm for the accurate detection of gait events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [83], three different modal time-varying dynamic data, marker trajectory using a six-camera motion capture system, ground reaction force using two force plates embedded in the floor, and eight channels of sEMG signals, were synchronously recorded by a motion capture system from the subjects in both pathological and normal groups. The monitored muscles involved the rectus femoris, long head of the biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and medial head of gastrocnemius of both lower limbs.…”
Section: Systems and Sensors In Physical Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%