2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19245499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Determination Method for Gait Event Based on Acceleration Sensors

Abstract: A gait event is a crucial step towards the effective assessment and rehabilitation of motor dysfunctions. However, for the data acquisition of a three-dimensional motion capture (3D Mo-Cap) system, the high cost of setups, such as the high standard laboratory environment, limits widespread clinical application. Inertial sensors are increasingly being used to recognize and classify physical activities in a variety of applications. Inertial sensors are now sufficiently small in size and light in weight to be par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported scores for ∆Start range from 0.012 to 0.072 s depending on the method and from 0.012 to 0.112 s for ∆End. These values are in accordance with several recent publications on the topic (≥ 2019): Caramia et al [74] (∆Start = 0.022 s, ∆End = 0.024 s), Kidzinski et al [35] (∆Start = 0.010 s, ∆End = 0.013 s), Gadaleta et al [34] (∆Start ≈ ∆End ≈ 0.040 s) and Mei et al [75] (∆Start ≈ ∆End ≈ 0.020 s). These values (summarised in Table 2) are to be compared with the results presented in this section.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Reported scores for ∆Start range from 0.012 to 0.072 s depending on the method and from 0.012 to 0.112 s for ∆End. These values are in accordance with several recent publications on the topic (≥ 2019): Caramia et al [74] (∆Start = 0.022 s, ∆End = 0.024 s), Kidzinski et al [35] (∆Start = 0.010 s, ∆End = 0.013 s), Gadaleta et al [34] (∆Start ≈ ∆End ≈ 0.040 s) and Mei et al [75] (∆Start ≈ ∆End ≈ 0.020 s). These values (summarised in Table 2) are to be compared with the results presented in this section.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For interactive information fusion, common fusion algorithms include Kalman filter [ 95 ], particle filter [ 96 ], complementary filter [ 97 ], and artificial neural network [ 98 ]. Generally, a single Kalman filter is not ideal, so the extended Kalman filter method or combined with other methods is a good choice [ 99 ].…”
Section: Gait Recognition Based On Information Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait refers to the movement and balance of the human body when walking upright, which is the basic movement mode of the lower limbs [ 1 , 2 ]. Under the control of the nervous system, gait is completed by the joint action of muscles, joints, and bones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%