1994
DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(94)80048-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous determination of ceftriaxone and streptomycin in mixture by ‘ratio-spectra’ 2nd derivative and ‘zero-crossing’ 3rd derivative spectrophotometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 An accurate choice of standard divisors and working wavelengths is fundamental for several reasons. 25,27,28 Easy measurements on separate peaks, higher values of the analytical signals and no need to work only at zero-crossing points (sometimes co-existing compounds have no maximum or minimum at these wavelengths) are advantages for ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry in comparison with the zerocrossing derivative spectrophotometry. Also, the presence of a lot of maxima and minima in ratio spectra derivative data was another advantage, since these wavelengths give an opportunity for the determination of these compounds in the presence of other active compounds and excipients that possibly interfered with the assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 An accurate choice of standard divisors and working wavelengths is fundamental for several reasons. 25,27,28 Easy measurements on separate peaks, higher values of the analytical signals and no need to work only at zero-crossing points (sometimes co-existing compounds have no maximum or minimum at these wavelengths) are advantages for ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry in comparison with the zerocrossing derivative spectrophotometry. Also, the presence of a lot of maxima and minima in ratio spectra derivative data was another advantage, since these wavelengths give an opportunity for the determination of these compounds in the presence of other active compounds and excipients that possibly interfered with the assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters, which include smoothing factor and divisor concentration, need to be optimized to give good selectivity, high sensitivity and an adequate signal to noise ratio. 52,53) Values of smoothing factor equal to 15 and 10 were suitable for CIP and MET determination, respectively, as these values revealed a suitable signal to noise ratio and the spectra showed good resolution. Best results in terms of sensitivity were found on using either MET (4 mg ml…”
Section: Optimization Of Conditions Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the mixture was filtered, and the residual STM concentrations were measured according to the method [23] using an UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-754, Shanghai, China) at a wavelength of 323 nm. In pH study, the initial solution pH was adjusted to 2-11 with 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH solutions and pH were measured by a pH meter (Model pHS-3C, Shanghai, China).…”
Section: Stm Adsorption Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%