2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous detection of bee viruses by multiplex PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiplex PCR method offers a significant cost-saving advantage, especially when large numbers of samples are analyzed (Sguazza et al 2013). Furthermore, multiplex PCR is able to detect multiple target DNA sequences in a single reaction, with the simultaneous identification of two or more kinds of pathogens, simplifying the workflow and processing time, which are significantly reduced (Bilgic et al 2013), among other advantages (Edwards and Gibbs 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplex PCR method offers a significant cost-saving advantage, especially when large numbers of samples are analyzed (Sguazza et al 2013). Furthermore, multiplex PCR is able to detect multiple target DNA sequences in a single reaction, with the simultaneous identification of two or more kinds of pathogens, simplifying the workflow and processing time, which are significantly reduced (Bilgic et al 2013), among other advantages (Edwards and Gibbs 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They rely on specific primers/probes and require known sequences in the target nucleic acid (Santos et al, 2004;Arya et al, 2005). Microarrays and multiplex PCR come in handy when one needs to analyze different viruses in one experiment (Wang et al, 2002;Chen et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2005;Topley et al, 2005;Glover et al, 2011;Sguazza et al, 2013).…”
Section: Viral Infections -Detection Nucleic Acid-based Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C sophisticated method C expensive equipment needed C indirect viral genome analysis C siRNA coverage of virus genome is unevenly distributed EM (electron microscopy) (Sguazza et al, 2013;Aubert et al, 2007) C no specific reagents are needed (method independent of virus type) C provides structural information C expensive and time consuming C low specificity due to similarity in size and shape of viruses Serological methods (ELISA, Western Blot, immunodiffusion) (Chen et al, 2004;Sguazza et al, 2013;Aubert et al, 2007) C useful in detection of similar, unknown viruses C when modified into LFT, the methods are very quick C require specific antibodies (production may be expensive) C lower specificity and sensitivity than molecular methods C require laboratory equipment (except ready-to-use diagnostic tests) C time consuming in standard format Using ELISA one can estimate virus concentration in a sample, if a reference material is available (Sguazza et al, 2013). Although serological methods do not require knowledge of antigen structure or sequence, there are still drawbacks associated with their use.…”
Section: Protein-based Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virus specific primers were based on the previous reports for DWV, BQCV, IAPV, SBV, ABPV, and CBPV (Sguazza et al, 2013), and KBV (Shen et al, 2005) (Tab. 1).…”
Section: Reverse Transcription-polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-pcr) Ampmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The reaction mixture and thermal cycling profiles of cDNA synthesis (Reverse Transcription System, Promega, Madison, WI) and the amplification, were performed as previously described (Sguazza et al, 2013). A negative and a positive DNA control were performed for each PCR reaction.…”
Section: Reverse Transcription-polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-pcr) Ampmentioning
confidence: 99%