2019
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous Capture and Detumble of a Resident Space Object by a Free-Flying Spacecraft-Manipulator System

Abstract: A maneuver to capture and detumble an orbiting space object using a chaser spacecraft equipped with a robotic manipulator is presented. In the proposed maneuver, the capture and detumble objectives are integrated into a unified set of terminal constraints. Terminal constraints on the end-effector's position and velocity ensure a successful capture, and a terminal constraint on the chaser's momenta ensures a post-capture chaser-target system with zero angular momentum. The manipulator motion required to achieve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main types of orbital robotic testbeds to off-load gravity and simulate the dynamics of the experimenting target in the micro-gravity environments-using air-bearing tables and using robotic arms. The air-bearing tables offer 3-DOF real motion [Virgili-Llop and Romano (2019)], while the robotic arms can deliver up to 6-DOF full dynamic motion with the cost of dynamics fidelity and increased system complexity [Artigas et al (2015); Colmenarejo et al (2018)]. The STAR LAB's testbed belongs to the second category [Hao et al (2019)].…”
Section: Physical Testbed Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main types of orbital robotic testbeds to off-load gravity and simulate the dynamics of the experimenting target in the micro-gravity environments-using air-bearing tables and using robotic arms. The air-bearing tables offer 3-DOF real motion [Virgili-Llop and Romano (2019)], while the robotic arms can deliver up to 6-DOF full dynamic motion with the cost of dynamics fidelity and increased system complexity [Artigas et al (2015); Colmenarejo et al (2018)]. The STAR LAB's testbed belongs to the second category [Hao et al (2019)].…”
Section: Physical Testbed Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional optimization and control methods have evidenced great results for on-orbit manipulation with rendezvous and docking in renowned mission scenarios (Virgili-Llop and Romano, 2019 ). These achievements are based on the accumulated work to study the service spacecraft's dynamics and kinematics with robotic arms in the free-floating condition (Umetani and Yoshida, 1989 ; Dubowsky and Papadopoulos, 1993 ; Wilde et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space manipulator systems, of the kinds used in space missions, have attracted much attention due to their high performance in active debris removal (Shan et al, 2016 ) and on-orbit servicing (Flores-Abad et al, 2014 ) in recent years. Over the past decades, a succession of technological advances has been made in both hardware device designs (Yoshida, 2009 ; Jaekel et al, 2018 ) and software algorithm developments (Nanos and Papadopoulos, 2017 ; Valverde and Tsiotras, 2018 ; Virgili-Llop and Romano, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, flexibility will improve the adaptability of the end effector, which ensures the manipulator is not easily damaged. However, flexibility will also include unexpected oscillations, which will significantly increase the propellant expenditure and influence the control precision (Virgili-Llop et al, 2017 ). In actual on-orbit tasks, especially when a space manipulator has finished performing trajectories and brakes, residual vibrations will be observed (Meng et al, 2018 ; Ren et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%