Inertial parameters characterise an object's motion under applied forces, and can provide strong priors for planning and control of robotic actions to manipulate the object. However, these parameters are not available a-priori in situations where a robot encounters new objects. In this paper, we describe and categorise the ways that a robot can identify an object's inertial parameters. We also discuss grasping and manipulation methods in which knowledge of inertial parameters is exploited in various ways. We begin with a discussion of literature which investigates how humans estimate the inertial parameters of objects, to provide background and motivation for this area of robotics research. We frame our discussion of the robotics literature in terms of three categories of estimation methods, according to the amount of interaction with the object: purely visual, exploratory, and fixed-object. Each category is analysed and discussed. To demonstrate the usefulness of inertial estimation research, we describe a number of grasping and manipulation applications that make use of the inertial parameters of objects. The aim of the paper is to thoroughly review and categorise existing work in an important, but under-explored, area of robotics research, present its background and applications, and suggest future directions. Note that this paper does not examine methods of identification of the robot's inertial parameters, but rather the identification of inertial parameters of other objects which the robot is tasked with manipulating.
Abstract-This paper addresses the problem of selecting from a choice of possible grasps, so that impact forces will be minimised if a collision occurs while the robot is moving the grasped object along a post-grasp trajectory. Such considerations are important for safety in human-robot interaction, where even a certified "human-safe" (e.g. compliant) arm may become hazardous once it grasps and begins moving an object, which may have significant mass, sharp edges or other dangers. Additionally, minimising collision forces is critical to preserving longevity of robots which operate in uncertain and hazardous environments, e.g. robots deployed for nuclear decommissioning, where removing a damaged robot from a contaminated zone for repairs may be extremely difficult and costly. Also, unwanted collisions between a robot and critical infrastructure (e.g. pipework) in such high-consequence environments can be disastrous. In this paper we investigate how the safety of the post-grasp motion can be considered during the pre-grasp approach phase, so that the selected grasp is optimal in terms applying minimum impact forces if a collision occurs during a desired post-grasp manipulation. We build on the methods of augmented robot-object dynamics models and "effective mass" and propose a method for combining these concepts with modern grasp and trajectory planners, to enable the robot to achieve a grasp which maximises the safety of the postgrasp trajectory, by minimising potential collision forces. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through several experiments with both simulated and real robots.
This paper addresses the problem of jointly planning both grasps and subsequent manipulative actions. Previously, these two problems have typically been studied in isolation, however joint reasoning is essential to enable robots to complete real manipulative tasks. In this paper, the two problems are addressed jointly and a solution that takes both into consideration is proposed. To do so, a manipulation capability index is defined, which is a function of both the task execution waypoints and the object grasping contact points. We build on recent state-of-the-art grasp-learning methods, to show how this index can be combined with a likelihood function computed by a probabilistic model of grasp selection, enabling the planning of grasps which have a high likelihood of being stable, but which also maximise the robot's capability to deliver a desired post-grasp task trajectory. We also show how this paradigm can be extended, from a single arm and hand, to enable efficient grasping and manipulation with a bi-manual robot. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach using experiments on a simulated as well as a real robot.
In this study the problem of fitting shape primitives to point cloud scenes was tackled as a parameter optimisation procedure, and solved using the popular bees algorithm. Tested on three sets of clean and differently blurred point cloud models, the bees algorithm obtained performances comparable to those obtained using the state-of-the-art random sample consensus (RANSAC) method, and superior to those obtained by an evolutionary algorithm. Shape fitting times were compatible with real-time application. The main advantage of the bees algorithm over standard methods is that it doesn't rely on ad hoc assumptions about the nature of the point cloud model like RANSAC approximation tolerance.
Active debris removal in space has become a necessary activity to maintain and facilitate orbital operations. Current approaches tend to adopt autonomous robotic systems which are often furnished with a robotic arm to safely capture debris by identifying a suitable grasping point. These systems are controlled by mission-critical software, where a software failure can lead to mission failure which is difficult to recover from since the robotic systems are not easily accessible to humans. Therefore, verifying that these autonomous robotic systems function correctly is crucial. Formal verification methods enable us to analyse the software that is controlling these systems and to provide a proof of correctness that the software obeys its requirements. However, robotic systems tend not to be developed with verification in mind from the outset, which can often complicate the verification of the final algorithms and systems. In this paper, we describe the process that we used to verify a pre-existing system for autonomous grasping which is to be used for active debris removal in space. In particular, we formalise the requirements for this system using the Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET). We formally model specific software components of the system and formally verify that they adhere to their corresponding requirements using the Dafny program verifier. From the original FRET requirements, we synthesise runtime monitors using ROSMonitoring and show how these can provide runtime assurances for the system. We also describe our experimentation and analysis of the testbed and the associated simulation. We provide a detailed discussion of our approach and describe how the modularity of this particular autonomous system simplified the usually complex task of verifying a system post-development.
Estimating the inertial properties of an object can make robotic manipulations more efficient, especially in extreme environments. This paper presents a novel method of estimating the 2D inertial parameters of an object, by having a robot applying a push on it. We draw inspiration from previous analyses on quasi-static pushing mechanics, and introduce a data-driven model that can accurately represent these mechanics and provide a prediction for the object's inertial parameters. We evaluate the model with two datasets. For the first dataset, we set up a V-REP simulation of seven robots pushing objects with large range of inertial parameters, acquiring 48000 pushes in total. For the second dataset, we use the object pushes from the MIT M-Cube lab pushing dataset. We extract features from force, moment and velocity measurements of the pushes, and train a Multi-Output Regression Random Forest. The experimental results show that we can accurately predict the 2D inertial parameters from a single push, and that our method retains this robust performance under various surface types.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.