2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01219-9_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous 3D Reconstruction for Water Surface and Underwater Scene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure was applied in real world and the comparison of the corrected depths with measured depths at 658 points showed a mean error and standard deviation of 0.06 m and 0.36 m, respectively, for a measured depth range of 3.4 m to 0.2 m. The same approach was also applied in [39] for refraction correction on bathymetry derived from a WorldView-2 stereopair. Results suggested a mean error of 0.03 m and an RMSE of 1.18 m. In [40], authors presented a first approach for simultaneously recovering the 3D shape of both the wavy water surface and the moving underwater scene, and tested over both synthetic and real data. There, after acquiring the correspondences across different views, the unknown water surface and underwater scene were estimated through minimizing an objective function under a normal consistency constraint.…”
Section: Analytical and Image-based Refraction Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure was applied in real world and the comparison of the corrected depths with measured depths at 658 points showed a mean error and standard deviation of 0.06 m and 0.36 m, respectively, for a measured depth range of 3.4 m to 0.2 m. The same approach was also applied in [39] for refraction correction on bathymetry derived from a WorldView-2 stereopair. Results suggested a mean error of 0.03 m and an RMSE of 1.18 m. In [40], authors presented a first approach for simultaneously recovering the 3D shape of both the wavy water surface and the moving underwater scene, and tested over both synthetic and real data. There, after acquiring the correspondences across different views, the unknown water surface and underwater scene were estimated through minimizing an objective function under a normal consistency constraint.…”
Section: Analytical and Image-based Refraction Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qian et al. [12] presented the first approach for simultaneously recovering the 3D shape of both a wavy water surface and a moving underwater scene. Xu et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang and Chen proposed a basic geometric model for underwater multi-view 3D reconstruction with the solution [6]. Recently, Qian et al achieved simultaneous reconstruction of underwater shape and wavy refractive surface using 9 cameras [18]. They computed surface normals in two different ways including Snell's law and quadric surface fitting, and applied optimization to make them consistent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some work concentrating on refractive interface parameter estimation rather than underwater or background shape reconstruction [15,18,23,14,21]. Morris and Kutulakos proposed refraction stereo for reconstructing a wavy liquid surface from known 2D-3D correspondences [15], which was extended by Qian et al using a regularizer to improve the accuracy [18]. Wetzstein et al reconstructed static transparent objects and dynamic liquid with light field probes [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%