1989
DOI: 10.1029/jc094ic06p08217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of radiocarbon in a coarse‐resolution world ocean model: 1. Steady state prebomb distributions

Abstract: This paper presents the results of five numerical simulations of the radiocarbon distribution in the ocean using the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory primitive equation world ocean general circulation model. The model has a 4.5° latitude by 3.75° longitude grid, 12 vertical levels, and realistic continental boundaries and bottom topography. The model is forced at the surface by observed, annually averaged temperatures, salinities, and wind stresses. There are no chemical transformations or transport of 14… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
151
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such circumstances, the models are "eddy-resolving," and they should begin to reproduce the state of the ocean from first principles. An additional desirable feature in such models is the capability to perform extended simulations on climatic time scales, as has been done by Toggweiler et al [1989]. At present, the latter capability can only be attained by sacrificing grid resolution.…”
Section: Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such circumstances, the models are "eddy-resolving," and they should begin to reproduce the state of the ocean from first principles. An additional desirable feature in such models is the capability to perform extended simulations on climatic time scales, as has been done by Toggweiler et al [1989]. At present, the latter capability can only be attained by sacrificing grid resolution.…”
Section: Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement with the excess CO 2 results is rather good between Equator and 30°N. At higher latitudes the agreement is poor because the subsurface waters in the Subarctic and Antarctic regions have a pre-industrial ∆C-14 concentration below -110‰ (Toggweiler et al, 1989;Chen and Rodman, 1990). Figure 10 shows an isogram map of the depth at which ∆C-14 equals -110‰.…”
Section: Lower Boundary Of Excess Co 2 Penetration In the North Pacifmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The preindustrial ∆C-14 concentration for low and mid-latitude waters in the Pacific Ocean is probably about -50‰, similar to the value in the Atlantic Ocean (Toggweiler et al, 1989). Figure 9 shows an isogram map of the depth where the ∆C-14 concentration equals to this value.…”
Section: Lower Boundary Of Excess Co 2 Penetration In the North Pacifmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Atmospheric A14C (the fractionation-corrected permil departure from a standard 14C/t2C ratio) is set to 0 permil and gas exchange is parameterized usin If the same formulation as for CO, In th model, a simplification is made by assuming that the C/12C ratio is conservative with respec ,mixmg b (Fiadiero, 1982, Toggweiler et al, 1989a) These simulations will be run until the deep ocean comes into equilibrium, which typically takes several thousand years Natural radiocarbon is used most effectively as a diagnostic of deep ocean circulation because of the limited number of observations made before the influence of nuclear bomb tests on the radiocarbon distribution 3 3.2 Bomb radiocarbon Beginning with the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests during the 195Os, the 14C content of the atmosphere and upper ocean increased sharply As shown in Figure 8, oceanographers have been able to use the bomb 14C signal in the ocean as a primary data set with which to evaluate ocean circulation models on decadal time scales. Here the observed surface A14C values from the eastern Pacific GEOSECS stations and the WOCE P17 line are compared with the global ocean circulation model of Toggweiler and Samuels (1995a,b) Interpretation of the bomb signal in surface waters for one time period is difficult if the natural signal is not removed (Broecker er al, 1985, Broecker et al, 1995 But taking the difference between two time periods easily isolates the bomb signal In doing so, we see that the model difference between 1973 and 1993 is much larger than the GEOSECS to WOCE difference, implying that the model is removing t4C from c-17 the surface ocean (presumably downward) much faster than is actually occurring This might suggest, for example, that this model would overestimate the uptake of anthropogenic CO, and the delivery of nutrients to the euphotic zone, particularly in the high latitudes.…”
Section: Tracers Of Ocean Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will simulate the natural radiocarbon distribution in our four models following OCMIP guidelines, which generally adopt the approach of Toggweiler et al (1989a). Atmospheric A14C (the fractionation-corrected permil departure from a standard 14C/t2C ratio) is set to 0 permil and gas exchange is parameterized usin If the same formulation as for CO, In th model, a simplification is made by assuming that the C/12C ratio is conservative with respec ,mixmg b (Fiadiero, 1982, Toggweiler et al, 1989a) These simulations will be run until the deep ocean comes into equilibrium, which typically takes several thousand years Natural radiocarbon is used most effectively as a diagnostic of deep ocean circulation because of the limited number of observations made before the influence of nuclear bomb tests on the radiocarbon distribution 3 3.2 Bomb radiocarbon Beginning with the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests during the 195Os, the 14C content of the atmosphere and upper ocean increased sharply As shown in Figure 8, oceanographers have been able to use the bomb 14C signal in the ocean as a primary data set with which to evaluate ocean circulation models on decadal time scales.…”
Section: Tracers Of Ocean Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%